User talk:Miyagawa/Archive 20

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxford Parliament (1258), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon de Montfort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: The God Thing
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: The God Thing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Interview Request
Hi Miyagawa. I work with the Learning and Evaluation team at WMF. I would like to talk to you about your experiences planning and running on-wiki writing/editing contests. Specifically, I am interested in learning more about your experiences working on the WikiCup. My goal is to learn more about the strategies that program leaders are using to plan and conduct successful writing and editing contests. We will create a toolkit to share this knowledge with program leaders across the movement. Please send me an email at if you are interested in setting up a time to speak, or if you have any questions or concerns. I hope to hear from you soon! KHarold (WMF) (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

A new reference tool
Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 12 Downing Street
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Edith Pitt
Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Herald -- The Herald (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise)
The article Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Herald -- The Herald (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!
-The Herald the joy of the LORD my strength 12:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cold Station 12, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strategem. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cold Station 12 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gene Roddenberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rolls-Royce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12
The article Cold Station 12 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cold Station 12 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 11:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Mistake!!
Sorry... it was a mistake..-The Herald • the joy of the LORD my strength 16:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * May be this will work in future..:) -The Herald • the joy of the LORD my strength 16:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Not again!! Can you please remove my rollback right for some time by when I'll be more acquainted with my newly acquired tablet? I can do with twinkle and live with that. Too many accidentals ruin my face. Thanks.-The Herald • the joy of the LORD my strength 14:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW, did I mistake you an admin? Sorry...-The Herald • the joy of the LORD my strength 14:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12
The article Cold Station 12 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cold Station 12 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Expanse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

deOrphaning script
Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as 's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of —  14:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus. Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
 * was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
 * took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
 * worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! , and  16:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Source request
Hi,

I was wondering if you might be able to help me access some info from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion, specifically the last page of the chapter on Looking for par'Mach in All the Wrong Places. The Google Books preview includes all of that chapter except what appears to be page 377, and I'd like to know if it has any useful info for the article. Many thanks in advance, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 11, March-April 2015 by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
 * New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
 * Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander Asher
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)
Hello! Your submission of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Whoa, why did you shut down your own DYK nomination? Those were the last points I was going to raise, we were almost there.  I know this may have gone past an average DYK review, but that happens sometimes – look at the review of one of my nominations, Template:Did you know nominations/International Conference on Hollywoodism, it went on for two months.  But I stayed in there and eventually it got promoted.  Wasted Time R (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I did the changes you suggested, I just ended up thinking that it wasn't worthwhile putting it up on the front page, that's all. Miyagawa (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)
The article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)
The article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Labour Party (UK) leadership election, 1988
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Nobel Prize in Physics
I have added new info, repaired all the dead links (most were), rewrote the entire article and added new cites. Along with it, updated and expanded the lead. Are they still not under the threshold of WikiCup rules? Can't understand why they aren't? Strange!!! Thanks for the understanding...-The Herald • the joy of the LORD my strength 19:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem with that one is that the citation changes might look large in bytes but don't really count as anything but copyediting or tweaks. So having removed those from the equation, this means you added the text "a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who conferred the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics", "Nobel laureates are selected by the Nobel Committee for Physics, a Nobel Committee that consists of five members elected by The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. In the first stage, several thousand people are asked to nominate candidates. These names are scrutinized and discussed by experts who", "The names of the nominees are never publicly announced, and neither are they told that they have been considered for the prize. Nomination records are sealed for fifty years." That's it = those four and a half sentences. Miyagawa (talk) 20:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 02:00, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)
The article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 02:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)
The article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Roddenberry
Finally had a chance to read through this. I think it's a solid article; while I can't speak to the coverage, it certainly hits all the major points (although I think you should briefly mention Roddenberry's involvement or lack thereof in the films past the first and second one.) Will definitely need a stiff copyedit at some point. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 12:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gene Roddenberry filmography‎
Harrias</b> talk 22:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Janice Rand
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm Confused
Hello:

I have been doing an extensive copy edit of your Gene Roddenberry article. I need to draw this to your attention. The following paragraph is confusing - perhaps you could rewrite it so that it makes sense?

"In 1972 and 1973, Roddenberry made a comeback to science fiction, selling ideas for four new series to a variety of networks.[134] Roddenberry's Genesis II was set in a post-apocalyptic Earth. He had hoped to recreate the success of Star Trek without "doing another space-hopping show". He created a 45-page writing guide, and proposed several story ideas based on the pretence that the scenario would have caused pockets of civilisation to regress to past eras or change altogether.[136] The pilot aired as a TV movie in March 1973, setting new records for the Thursday Night Movie of the Week. Roddenberry was asked to produce four more scripts for episodes but, before production began again, CBS aired Planet of the Apes. The ratings were poor, and Genesis II was scrapped and replaced by a Apes television series.[137]"

The way this reads to me is that Genesis II was a ratings success, setting records. Then Planet of the Apes Was shown and the ratings were poor. So Genesis II was cancelled and POTA was made into a series. See my problem? Thanks. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're quite right - the line "the ratings were poor" can't be right, so I'm not sure what I was thinking. I'll double check the source when I get home tonight and correct it. BTW, massive thanks for copyediting this article. Miyagawa (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it now - the ratings weren't poor, they were even higher than ''Genesis II'. Miyagawa (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year/archive1
As you have previously commented on similar nominations, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year which is now nominated at Featured list candidates/Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year/archive1? <b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b> talk 11:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've responded to your query on the nom page; I'm sort of in two minds about it, but wonder what you think? <b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b> talk 09:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Further Roddenberry Questions
Hello again: In the section of your article on Roddenberry – Star Trek Revival - you originally wrote the opening paragraph as follows:

"Due to lack of funds, Roddenberry was unable to buy the full rights to Star Trek for $150,000 in the early 1970s, leading Lou Scheimer to approach  the company in 1973 about creating an animated Star Trek series. "

As this was unclear to me, I rewrote it as:

"Due to lack of funds, Roddenberry was unable to buy the full rights to Star Trek for $150,000 in the early 1970s. Lou Scheimer approached the company in 1973 about creating an animated Star Trek series."

As I was working on my final pass of the copy edit I realized there’s still a disconnect between these two sentences as I've written them. Could you check and clarify:

Who was GR trying to buy the rights to Star Trek from? Is the fact he couldn’t buy the rights the reason for Scheimer approaching the company (which company, by the way) to produce an animated series?

I’m almost finished the final copy edit - just a few sections to go.

Thanks Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * - you're quite right, that doesn't explain who they're referring to! In both cases it was Paramount Television, which had formed out of Desilu Productions. Miyagawa (talk) 22:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Gene Roddenberry Article
Hello: Just a quick note to say that my copy edit is finished. I hope that you're pleased with it. I learned a lot from the article. I assume one of the supervisors of the GOCE will look it over before removing and archiving your copy edit request. Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of XCOM 2
Hello! Your submission of XCOM 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Rhain1999  (talk to me) 10:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

2012 Summer Olympics medal table FL promotion
Hi there,

I am planning to improve the medal table of 2012 Summer Olympics for featured list consideration next February. I want to start making changes right now because I may have a heavier college workload come fall. I need help where to start (I did a few edits last year).
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've just taken a look and the article is already in pretty good shape. The table seems to be correctly formatted, and the existing material is all cited. If you have further information to add to it, then by all means but I think it's not far off an FL already. Miyagawa (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Call for Volunteers

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
 * Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
 * Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
 * Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
 * Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)  Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Request to submit delayed Wikicup submissions
Hi Miyagawa, tomorrow I will be going on holiday until the 24th but I have a few potential WikiCup submissions going through the proceedures at the moment. Is it OK if anything that gets promoted between now and then be accepted if I submit it when I return?  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 09:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yep, that'll be fine. Miyagawa (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 21:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise)
The article Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 18:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Bobby Chinn
Hi, any chance you could expand this?♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I managed to get it past the 1500 minimum for DYK and have nominated it there. I couldn't find a great deal on it, but certainly I now have a go to place if I ever end up in Hanoi! Miyagawa (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Excellent work, thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for XCOM 2
Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Bobby Chinn (restaurant) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 02:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)
The article Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rejoined
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rejoined you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Tuna (dog)
Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: The God Thing
The article Star Trek: The God Thing you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Star Trek: The God Thing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 16:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Augments you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)
The article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Csisc Status
Dear User,

I had withdrawn from 2015 WikiCup. Please update the 2015 WikiCup Standings.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bobby Chinn (restaurant)
Gatoclass (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikicup Round 4 submissions yet?
I see you have just cleared my round 3 wikicup submissions page - does this mean I can submit one which has just been promoted or should I wait until tomorrow?&mdash; Rod talk 16:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd wait till tomorrow - it'll stop people from getting riled up. Miyagawa (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * OK.&mdash; Rod talk 19:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Bonus point table
You are more than welcome to add a link from my submissions to this table if that is helpful...Godot13 (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)
The article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 05:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

FP bonus
Hi Miyagawa-

I deleted the bonus point notation for my first FP submission because the bot somehow misread it as a claim for FPO points. If my deletion does not correct the scoreboard, could you please manually delete the FPO points posted. Thanks.--Godot13 (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I also think I found a way to represent the bonus points (not tallied) in the FP section- simply add them in italics (or bold) after the description. Let me know if that works.--Godot13 (talk) 04:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Lets go with that instead, that looks to work better. Miyagawa (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek Beyond at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rejoined
The article Rejoined you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rejoined for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments
The article The Augments you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Augments for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 00:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Good job. I'm working on closing out the review.  Thanks, again. Viriditas (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

DYK for Omar Allibhoy
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments
The article The Augments you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Augments for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Good topics for GA Cup
Hi, I see you removed some of the articles which made up the Good Topic English Heritage properties in Somerset from scoring points. This is different from my interpretation of the rules which say: Perhaps I'm reading it wrong?&mdash; Rod talk 07:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Points are awarded per article in the topic that was worked on by you. If you would have a right to claim points for the promotion of the article to good or featured status, you have the right to claim points for its promotion as part of the topic, even if you did not nominate the topic.
 * This applies even if the work on these articles was not done this year, as long as you have done significant work on at least one article in the topic this year.


 * Would it be worth putting this discussion on the wikicup talk page, so that others would be aware of our different interpretations of the rules for scoring on this? Perhaps the wording could be tightened (for next years competition)?&mdash; Rod talk 07:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bring that to my attention - I'd missed the third bullet, so I'll go restore those articles now to your submissions page and the bot will pick it up on the next pass. Miyagawa (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I think this will apply to Featured topic candidates/Scheduled monuments in Somerset/archive1 and a future GT nomination on National Trust properties in the county I'm hoping to nominate before long, so wanted to ensure my reading was right.&mdash; Rod talk 07:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It's quite clear - until one of the judges missed 1/3 of the rules on it! :) Miyagawa (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

GT and FT candidates
Thanks for your contribution at Featured topic candidates/English Heritage properties in Somerset/archive1 which has now been promoted as a good topic. Would you be kind enough to take a look at Featured topic candidates/Scheduled monuments in Somerset/archive1 which is currently nominated for featured topic?&mdash; Rod talk 07:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 12, May-June 2015 by, , ,

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
 * Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
 * Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
 * American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Your GA nomination of Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise)
The article Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Star Trek Beyond
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)