User talk:MizSan915

Sorry, I didn't know that this going to be a back and forth or that you were waiting for me to respond to something. I'm busy and don't come here much.

Here's my point and it's quite straight forward. Any time the outcome of case is unknown and all the parties are still walking around free, you know that there's not much to it. If you feel better leaving it up go right ahead, I just feel bad for anybody who get's accused of something, large or small and obviously is not convicted of the crime. If the media doesn't find anything that means there's nothing to find, yet the person gets their name dragged through the mud like you are so hell bent on doing. It's a shame, but go ahead and have fun with it if it's what you do.

MizSan915 (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

It is important because people who commit those types of actions generally don't only do them once. I believe it is very much a relevant piece of information for the voters in his Congressional district. Or are you cool with someone who participates in unwanted physical touching, offensive sexual language and other behaviors representing several hundred thousand people?

I'll wait for a reply before I go back to the page. If you can make a credible argument about why this doesn't matter, I'll listen.

--

Still no response? Maybe because you know that you don't change a person's character overnight. There was a very interesting letter to the editor the other day in the Courier Post. Did you catch it? http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/opinion/readers/2014/05/06/letter-minor-part-machine/8739593/

As you enter the spotlight, the little things matter more because they show who you really are. The 6,000 residents of Logan Twp might not care about the character of their mayor, but the 700,000 of NJ-1 certainly deserve to hear the full story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wall-e 2.0 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * In any event, per WP:BLP, while these are still unsubstantiated allegations, they should not appear in the article and if you continue to add them back, they will be reverted and you may be blocked.--ukexpat (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)