User talk:Mjf08

!
I understand that you're obsessed with Michael Johns. I like him a lot, too. But your edits are highly unprofessional and far from encylopedic. Please opt for suggesting in the Talk pages rather than making these slightly unconstructive edits.

The table title will remain, no matter how much you dislike it. I originally had it as solely American Idol performances, but someone insisted on adding his auditions in there. But we don't do that with the rest of the contestants, so I had to change the title from an even more ridiculous one "American Idol performances during the weeks in which votes were counted" or something. (Disgusting, right? =P) So I added those nice write-ups about his auditions. Hopefully, they pleased you. But the chart having its own section is a requirement, to keep consistency with the rest of the Top 12 contestants.

After some thought, the controversy section makes sense. I didn't think it was necessary, since I didn't realize Melinda Doolittle had one as well. But when I saw she did, it seemed fair that Michael deserves one, too. The only warning I have is when you compose these edits, MAKE SURE you avoid subjectivity and such. Some of these quotes from Ryan Seacrest following his elimination are irrelevant. I suggest keeping the part up to "apologized and blamed Nigel" or something. Also, the Nielsen ratings might be erroneous to Michael's controversy, okay?

Anyway, it's nice you can expand on Michael's page...just keep it tidy. Leave the chart alone--that's my domain, haha. And um...guess that's about it. If you want to reply to this message, please do so on MY talk page (click on the "oy_gevalt" superscript next to my username). Ahhh, I'm listening to Michael's 2 Beatles and 1 Dolly recordings...soooo amazing. Well, happy editing!--Cinemaniac86Oy_gevalt. 23:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)