User talk:Mjharmstone

Don't Scare the Hare
Hi and thanks for adding the episode guide. Game 2 in weeks 1 and 2 was the one with the lilypads, but I can't remember what it's called. No doubt they'll have it again. I think Game 1 may have also been Alarm-a-geddon last week, but am not 100 percent certain of this. Hope this helps. TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * My mistake. Game 1 on week 2 involved a chicken that laid giant eggs. Man, this quiz is so naff, but I'm becoming a fan. :) TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. I believe it's available on Youtube, but haven't actually looked so far. I might see what I can find when I have a spare few minutes. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Just looking now, there are clips of it, but not full episodes. Anyway, a piece of luck. The one with the lilypads is called "Pond Memories". :) TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Aussie Race
Could you please add the Leg 7 prize to The Amazing Race Australia?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Done as requested Mjharmstone (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And remember to leave messages on user talk pages. Not User pages.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Was there a prize on episode 7? Someone has said that Grant Bowler said that the end of the Poland episode was leg 8. Also, if you could update the Roadblock counts under The Amazing Race Australia, that would also help.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 00:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * At the end of episode 7, he said "You're still racing", which signifies that it was leg 7, not leg 8. He may be confused about it being the 8th pitstop, cause even the clues before the 7th said along the lines of "Find Grant Bowler". There was no prize for the midpoint though, no. Mjharmstone (talk) 10:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Correction - it sounds like they took a leaf outta the American book and did two legs back to back, but with no prize for Chris & Anastasia. Shall update to signify that. Mjharmstone (talk) 10:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Biggest Loser UK (series 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunderland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Biggest Loser Australia: Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheel of Fortune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Coach Trip (series 8), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackheath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Mole (American season 5) into The Mole (American season 6). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

The Traitors (British TV series) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Traitors (British TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Most likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Right now, there is not enough sourcing to satisfy either WP:GNG or WP:VERIFY. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:43, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Traitors (British TV series) (November 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Traitors (British TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Traitors_(British_TV_series) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bearcat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Traitors_(British_TV_series) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)