User talk:Mjterry13

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inspirock (March 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspirock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inspirock, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Inspirock Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Inspirock reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inspirock (April 4)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Inspirock Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Despite the addition of large amounts of content, the reason(s) for the past declines have not been met. Indeed, all of the content added is either WP:PRIMARY or not in depth (the press releases and funding announcements are particularly egregious) enough to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The editorializing of blogs does not help, nor does the clearly-evident SPA activity. Furthermore, the draft seems to only be interested in promoting the subject, which contradicts WP:NOT. Given this and the previous deletions from the mainspace, I am rejecting the topic as being unsuitable.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)