User talk:Mkasprow

Welcome!
Hello, Mkasprow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Double Sour Douchebag cocktail, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of "Double Sour Douchebag cocktail"
A page you created, Double Sour Douchebag cocktail, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, unlike Jamie who deleted this, you are at least civil. This is not a hoax under G3, which Jaime cites as his reason for deletion. This has an establishment and unrelated individuals asscociated with it, and 3rd party validation. Unless Jaime can prove it is a hoax under G3, which he of course cannot, I expect this page to be republished immediately


 * Unfortunately, the burden of proof is on you, the creator of the content. If you have reliable secondary sources feel free to create a new article with those appropriate references. Until then, your articles will be deleted. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 21:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for things you just made up
If you continue to create articles like that, you will be blocked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Jaime...this is not a hoax under G3, this is attributable to an establishment, to various people and has 3rd party validation. With all due respect, your twitchy delete finger smacks of "how come other people have more fun than me"

Unless you can absolutely prove that this is a hoax, under G3 which you cite, the page should be republished immediately