User talk:Mkativerata/Ahmad Nasharuddin

Religion
Per WP:BLP we can't insert a religion for this person without a direct source confirming that he is a Muslim. I understand he is a member of UMNO but that cannot be taken as proof that he is either Malay or Muslim, despite the very high likelihood.--Mkativerata (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have read the link to WP:BLP. It says "all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged". How can it possibly be challenged that Ahmad is a Muslim? He is a member of the United Malays National Organisation. Per Article 160(2) of the Malaysian Constitution, "Malay" means "a person who professes to the religion of Islam". Therefore, he is a Muslim.--KMalaysia (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply but I'd suggest you read WP:OR - you're undertaking your own research to form the view that Ahmad is a Muslim. In any event, a Constitutional definition cannot affect a person's religion. I accept that there is a 99.99% chance Ahmad is a Muslim, but we still need a direct source to confirm it. Per WP:BLP I'm reverting again until a source can be found. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * KMakaysia, Per BLPCAT religions have to be self-identified. It is something that needs a source, even if it seems obvious. Gigs (talk) 19:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Additional optional question from Mkativerata
 * X. Wind back the clock to October 2010 and assume you are an administrator at the time. A new editor who you have welcomed has asked for your help on your talk page: [LINK]. The new editor is complaining about very recent (within the last few minutes) bullying and edit-warring by an administrator, Mkativerata, at this article. (Assume that the article is real and in the mainspace). After reviewing the article history and talk page, please (a) respond to the new editor (doing so on your talk page); and (b) describe below what, if any, action you are going to take in respect of the article and the editors concerned.
 * A: