User talk:Mkfadani19/Draft

Online abuse notes
This is for the very first section, the one immediately under the section "online abuse" - the subsections will be in different sections.

Be careful about sourcing. The sourcing needs to explicitly state what you're trying to claim. If it doesn't make this point very clearly, then you can't place the information in the article. For example, one source was about child sexual abuse and online predators for the most part and didn't actually give a list of examples of online abuse. Some of these were mentioned, but it wasn't clearly stated and as such, isn't a good source for this. The NSPCC source did state this and would be better as a source for the claim.

Also watch out for redundancy. I saw two sentences that said the same thing for the most part, so there isn't really a need for both.

Be cautious with POV terms like "unique", as these are fairly subjective and come across as the point of view of a specific person. To this end, things like "as it suggests" or variations of this are also subjective because what is obvious to one may not be to another.

Be cautious of using this source, as the study surveyed people above the age of 15. Abuse experienced by an adult or someone older than 15 may differ from that of a young child, specifically when it comes to which sex or gender is predominantly harassed. They looked to have grouped the 15 year olds in the "15-29" age group, so that's a fairly wide variety of age experiences. It's so general that I'd honestly recommend not including it since we can't tell how large of an input the people in the 15-18 year group actually had. I've removed this from the draft.

Avoid unclear dates like "just now" since things can go out of date pretty quickly - the US task force was actually launched in 1998, so it wouldn't really be a "just now" type of situation.

I know that this all can sound harsh - it isn't meant to be, I just want to make sure that your work is the best possible work it can be. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Cyberbullying
A lot of this is going to revolve around summarization, as you want to make sure that the content is concise and isn't repeating information that can be found elsewhere. This section would likely only need to be about 1-3 paragraphs long, as any more detail than the very general content would be something that should be in the main cyberbullying article. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)