User talk:Mkistner6/sandbox

Jessica's peer review
1) lead section Reading on the lead section alone, I understand the importance of the topic. After reading the rest of the article, I think the lead section reflects the most important information. Everything mentioned in the lead section is concise and useful. The first sentence gives the definition of the topic clearly and the second sentence explains how the concept is applied and common types of it. There is nothing redundant or missing. Overall, it is easy to understand and states the most important information of vertical seismic profile.

2) structure The sections of the article are organized well in a sensible order. There are five sections in total. The first section is the lead section followed by three paragraphs and lastly references. The three paragraphs are presented in a chronological order. The first one talks about the application of vertical seismic profile, the second one talks about the process of deconvolution that utilizes method of vertical seismic profile, and the third one discusses recent uses and technologies related to vertical seismic profile. Each section has their own emphasis on different topics related to the subject.

3) balanced coverage Every section in the article has similar lengths and each section's length is equal to its importance. All the sections are necessary and have important points. With the two articles provided in the reference, the article reflects the perspectives represented in the journal articles. The article provides a neutral viewpoints that does not sway the readers to accept only one particular point of view. Overall, the article is well-balanced in terms of its length and content. It provides different viewpoints and applications of vertical seismic profile.

4) neutral content The article is written in a neutral tone. There is no specific viewpoint or opinion that the author puts more weight on. The article is mainly describing the application and uses of vertical seismic profile. The article does not make claims on behalf of people. It simply focuses on real life applications and concepts of the topic itself. There is no sentence that implies the author's perspective or standpoint of the topic. The author is not trying to persuade the reader into any particular idea.

5) Reliable sources. The statements in the article are connected to the journal articles provided in the references section. Statements came equally from both sources. Both sources are reliable journal articles. The second paragraph describing methods for acquiring a vertical seismic profile comes from the author's side. The third paragraph and the fourth paragraph are each cited from the sources. Overall, the statements and information provided in the article is balanced. There is no learning toward any single point of view, different viewpoints from different sources are presented.Ywangg (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)