User talk:Mknight1971

Saskatchewan Party
Heh Mknight1971, thank you for helping to revert the vandalism by CJCurrie/Bearcat/Schnits on this article, especially the re-instatement of spurious references to Brad Wall's activities 15 years ago (which are thoroughly documented on Brad Wall's page anyways). Two of them are admitted partisans, which makes their conduct even more egregious per the Conflict of interest policy.

Do you have any ideas on how the conflict could be resolved? I am obviously very concerned that the vandals will continue injecting spurious information and POV to the article, using sources that bear little, if any credibility, or merely are comprised of rumour, innuendo, or conjecture.

I think we have been taking a correct approach by not editing the Sask NDP page (thus maintaining the moral high ground) with various pieces of 'truth' about their terms in power (just the scandals alone could fill several pages). Obviously its not the nature of Dipper's to show the same high level of respect, but if you have any ideas on dealing with them, that would be greatly appreciated. 64.110.251.69 23:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Ardenn 00:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Ardenn 01:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Quit deleting legit edits and this would not be an issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mknight1971 (talk • contribs)

Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. Ardenn 01:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Please remember to quit reverting legit edits.

I've reported you for violating 3RR. Ardenn 01:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)