User talk:Mkpan

Welcome!
Hello, Mkpan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Daivajna Acharya Dinam, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Daivajna Acharya Dinam


A tag has been placed on Daivajna Acharya Dinam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Daivajna Acharya Dinam, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC) =(Request for revision of speedy deletion)=

Hi Jim1138,

The removal of Templates were not intentional and was solely due to  beginners  inexperience and ignorance on  certain  Wikipedia policy. Now it is about the article  deleted  Diavanja Acharya Dinam, please not that it is about a annual religious observance. See that, my contribution by way of creating this new article titled Daivajna Acharya Dinam , had no other  intention than enriching the encyclopedia.

the article was about an yearly collective event ( special day observance) observed by a social group in Kerala, the source of information about the event was referenced from a popular print news media. So it is a notable one. it might serve the function of informing the people, who searches the Wikipedia in English, to know about the concept of the name of that event. The article was created not for the promotion of a person or commercial establishment  etc. its sources of references are reliable and valid and verifiable too. Mkpan (talk) 06:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daivajna Acharya Dinam
Hello Mkpan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daivajna Acharya Dinam for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Josu4u,

The removal of Templates were not intentional and was solely due to beginners inexperience and ignorance on certain Wikipedia policy.

The article  Daivajna Acharya Dinam  is definitely  an interesting and significant one, due to the peculiarity  of the name of the annual religious observance, Daivajna Acharya Dinam, and the social group who observe this day. Creation of an article, on this subject, does not violate  the wikipedia policy guideline. let us wait for a short while before deleting it, so that editors can add more reliable information on it. so please help to reinstate the article Mkpan (talk) 10:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Mkpan (talk) 10:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23


 * I'm not promising anything, but as a start, please explain the following: (1) in your own words, what is sock puppetry? (2) why you created multiple accounts, (3) disclose the accounts you created, and (4) what you would do if you were unblocked. Comment below mine, not in the unblock request itself.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

1. sorry if you feel Iam bullying You.. it is not so.. let me quote the  content from sock puppetry   for the answer to 1st question  "The use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper purpose is called sock puppetry (often abbreviated in discussion as socking). Improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks or otherwise violate community standards and policies. The term comes from sock puppet, an object shaped roughly like a sock and used on the hand to create a character to entertain or inform. In Internet terminology it is an online identity used for deception. Wikipedia editors are generally expected to edit using only one (preferably registered) account. Using a single account maintains editing continuity, improves accountability, and increases community trust, which helps to build long-term stability for the encyclopedia. While there are some valid reasons for maintaining multiple accounts on the project, the improper use of multiple accounts is not allowed.

Sock puppetry can take on several different forms:

Creating new accounts to avoid detection Using another person's account (piggybacking) Logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address Reviving old unused accounts (sometimes referred to as sleepers) and presenting them as different users Persuading friends or acquaintances to create accounts for the purpose of supporting one side of a dispute (usually called meatpuppetry)

The misuse of multiple accounts is considered a serious breach of community trust. It is likely to lead to:

a block of all affected accounts a ban of the user (the sockmaster or sockpuppeteer) behind the accounts (each of which is a sockpuppet or sock) on-project exposure of all accounts and IP addresses used across Wikipedia and its sister projects the (potential) public exposure of any "real-world" activities or personal information deemed relevant to preventing future sock puppetry or certain other abuses.[1]

Editors who want to use more than one account for some valid reason should provide links between them on the respective user pages (see below), with an explanation of the purpose of each account or of the relationship between them. If so desired, the user and user talk pages from one account can be redirected to the other. Editors who use unlinked alternative accounts, or who edit as an IP address editor separate from their account, should carefully avoid any crossover on articles or topics, because even innocuous activities such as copy editing, wikifying, or linking might be considered sock puppetry in some cases and innocuous intentions will not usually serve as an excuse...."

Answer to the 2nd and 3rd questions was given in the first request itself. so please understand me.

If Iam unblocked, I will be able to make more contributions to Wikipedia, and the editing and creation of articles will be carried out , only in full conformation with the existing  Wikipedia policies

After all we all are mere mortal human beings ..err is human .. we learn from our mistakes.... No one is born with all of these skills. They are learned and make improvement along with our growth and development Mkpan (talk) 17:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * In my view, you haven't answered any of my questions. Either you didn't answer them at all, or you responded in a wholly unsatisfactory fashion. You didn't explain the policy in your own words; you just quoted it. You didn't really answer the second and third questions in the first unblock request. Your answer to the last question was general and vague. As an aside, I never said you were bullying me. I have no idea where that comes from.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Dear Bbb23 sorry I dont understand Why you cannot comprehend me. I have sincerely answered to your queries. I wish ,my mind must be flexible enough to  perceive  things clearly  and should not be like a rigid retard .. please go through my last wordings  that is the best answer to all misunderstandings. I have no resent upon your attitude and response.. what I present, here is only  a sincere  request for reverting the block .. but unfortunately, it seems you are not in a position to remove the block ,imposed upon me , due to reasons beyond  our capacity.Mkpan (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's highly unlikely that anyone is going to unblock you if you are incapable of posting coherent responses to our questions, per our policy on competence. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Dear OhNo itsJamie competency is a state we acquire through experience and learning. We must be wary of the nature of clarification seeking- method. we resort to, other wise the respondent may mis perceive  it, as  sadistic ( punitive ) measures .. sorry if my message is incoherent. I was trying to convey my anguish in an euphemistic way. still you cannot comprehend means, you are not willing to accept my sincere request for reverting the block Mkpan (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is true. I cannot comprehend means. Whatever that means. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

I believe you could achieve the present status only because of the unhampered opportunities granted to you, sincerely by then wikipedia admins for gathering experience .. yet a lot more to learn from it .. Mkpan (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this only acquiesce formidably, realm of apprehension and cohesion desires to commend...reformulate from aspire visionary truth. Goals. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)


 * This is getting too metaphysical for me. @Mkpan, your block may be lifted or reduced only by a CheckUser per policy. I am a CheckUser, and there is a small group of others, including, for example, who just declined your unblock request. Honestly, for a variety of reasons, I see no point to continuing this discussion, and unless it becomes productive, I may cut it off by blocking your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Bbb23 for your kind advice, if  you feel I am not competent to continue , you can block me for ever. I am here not to argue with you. please don't demoralize the beginners. I know ,the God almighty may block our frontal lobe ( stroke) or heart at any time ,against which we are helpless. ( remember that every human is unique, but none is an immortal Super-being ). I expected that all admins in Wikipedia  will have the age appropriate social, moral and emotional maturity apart from the  competency in esoteric exercises. Unfortunately my experience with few admins I encountered was frustrating and bitter. Still I hope not all are of same nature. I believe i have not done any big crime to be blocked,except few unintentional mistakes made, as a novice. Again I promised such errors will not occur in the foregoing course of my work with wikipedia. so if you can't accept my words and dislike my presence here, I have no other option than give up my interest to pursue. Have a nice dayMkpan (talk) 03:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

DearOhNo itsJamie, Most often, the pride and relief of an ignorant clown will be manifested as Kabbalistic verbalization   or   at times it will be a  prodromal performance of demenser lunie. thank you for all support.Mkpan (talk) 03:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)