User talk:Mlitwa1

Welcome!
Hello, Mlitwa1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2014
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Christology. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. This include "book spam", or adding a reference merely to get the book's name known. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Ref spam
Hi ,

It looks like you may have created this account solely to add links to your own published material. While the work may indeed be relevant to the given articles, please take a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, and WP:REFSPAM. As you cannot possibly be neutral in choosing the best source (even if yours is the best source), adding links to your own work is seen as a type of promotion and a conflict of interest. If you feel that your work would benefit an article, don't just link to it; improve the article with it. Or mention it on the talk page to let other people make use of it. Thanks. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  18:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * And if your work is the only source for a subject, then it probably is too minor a position to cover in an article -- see WP:UNDUE. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Christology. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Single purpose account COI refspammer. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
A brief survey suggests that your sole purpose on Wikipedia is to promote your own writings. This is considered a flagrant abuse of a volunteer-run, charity-funded project. You are now blocked form editing. Guy (Help!) 21:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)