User talk:Mllemohoy

Welcome!

Hello, Mllemohoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kraisit Agnew, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vanadus (talk | contribs) 19:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Kraisit Agnew


The article Kraisit Agnew has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced claim of winning "numerous national awards". Her "official website" provided does not mention her being a part of Celtic Woman. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 19:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kraisit Agnew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraisit Agnew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kraisit Agnew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 02:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kraisit Agnew. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 03:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kraisit Agnew with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kraisit Agnew with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kraisit Agnew. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly removing removing the AfD template on Kraisit Agnew. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Guerillero &#124; My Talk  05:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add semi-protection templates to articles which are not semi-protected, as you did to Kraisit Agnew. This is misleading for other editors and does not semi-protect the page. If you want a page to have protection applied, you need to ask an admin to do it via WP:RPP. However, since the Kraisit Agnew article has not been subject to vandalism, it is highly unlikely that a request for page protection would be granted. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 08:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kraisit Agnew, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Again, do not add misleading semi-protection tags to articles which are not semi-protected, as you did to Kraisit Agnew. This is disruptive and continuing this behavior will lead to being blocked from editing again.'' Sparthorse (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 22:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)