User talk:Mm40/Archive 4

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Mm40! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 23:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks
Thanks for your review of Augustus E. Willson. I'm glad you enjoyed the article, and it's always nice to have the same editor return to review another of my articles. I suppose my mission is to see how many GA reviewers I can burn out with articles about Kentucky governors! Anyway, thanks again, and I hope you will find any future articles of mine equally enjoyable. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 14:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

David Bowie discography
Hi, thanks for your input at the FLC. I've addressed your comments, please let me know if there's anything else. Thanks, JD554 (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 24 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
 * Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject New Jersey
Hi, Mm40, User:Nightscream and I had a disagreement over certain parts of NJ municipality articles; because the discussion could potentially affect hundreds of articles, we decided to bring the discussion to WikiProject New Jersey. I would value your input in the discussion, which you can find here. Thanks, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 15:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

MLB All-Star Game MVP
Thanks for your comment at the FLC, I think all your issues have been resolved! Staxringold talkcontribs 14:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Reverting to inert sapm on Victoria Coren
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Victoria Coren has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mm40 (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If you think that a page that defaults to a sites 404 link, with an edit record which summaries as so is "unconstructive," I suggest you might like to think again. Rgds, --217.42.181.231 (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit Request
Hi Mm40!

I saw your name under the list of copyeditors providing their services to WP:MILHIST, so I've decided to ask your help.

I've nominated this article: Operation Badr (1973), for GA class. A peer review of the article a few months back raised comments that the article needed a copyedit and an audit for POV language. So how about it?

I had asked another user to copyedit, but he's way too busy with real life issues. I would be grateful for your assistance. Thanks. --Sherif9282 (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for your help. --Sherif9282 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

FLC
Hello, I resolved the issues you pointed out at Featured list candidates/Lily Allen discography/archive1. Would you please take another look and state your support/oppose? Thank you.--12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of US Open Men's Singles champions/archive1
I believe that I have address most or all of your concerns with the page Mm40! By the way, you have a rather cool user name! TW-RF talk 22:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.44.215 (talk)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

You asked about AWB
Personally I have downloaded the SVN version of 4.9, and have that working fine, though it has a few quirks. I will put up with quirks, versus having no tools. -- billinghurst (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Your revert
if you are going to revert use a valid reason. Removing a single redundant word is not "appears to have removed content from the page without explanation." You are responsible for actions you perform with Wiki editing tools. 174.21.198.176 (talk) 17:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

 * From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
 * News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

It's me
Hi Mm40. It’s me, Artichoke-Boy. I’ve been thinking on what you said about using my knowledge of Seinfeld to use in Wikiepdia, and I’m going to go through with it. Improving the coverage of Seinfeld episode articles is going to be my new Wiki-goal.

But I digress.

What I wanted to ask you was whether or not I can change the quality-rating on an article (stub, start, C-class, etc.). Or do I need some special title to do so?

 ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 22:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * There's no problem with reassessing articles yourself, as long as you have not made significant contributions to the article, because you might not be able to look at it like a reader would, with fresh eyes. For more info, see here and here. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks a lot.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 16:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

The Mango
Hi, it’s me (again), Artichoke-Boy.

I apologize if I’m bothering you at the moment, but I want to know if you could do me a little favor. I’ve been working to improve "The Mango", which is a Seinfeld episode article, and I’ve added a significant amount of good information into it (the article was originally very small and lacked content in general).

Anyway, I believe that it supersedes "stub" quality, and I was wondering if you could read over it from a neutral point of view and see if it deserves to be bumped up a notch or two on the quality scale (since I’m not allowed to bump it up myself).

Thanks a lot, any help is greatly appreciated.  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 20:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * After looking at it, I think it's closer to start class than stub, so I'll reassess it. For further improvement, I suggest referencing the awards/nominations section, expanding the Reception section (adding more reviews), and try to incorporate the trivia into the other sections. Also, I'm not sure about the quote section. Mm40 (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm taking care of your suggestions now. Do you think I should just nix the entire "quotes" section? It was there before I started working on the article, and I just started expanding that along with everything else. Do you think it seems too extraneous, or worth keeping?  ARTICHOKE-BOY  (Talk) 20:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: GA sweeps
Your reviews look good to me. Remember to follow the instructions OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

 * Opinion essay: White Barbarian
 * Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
 * Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
 * News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

GA review for Teaneck, New Jersey
I went through all of the items listed at Talk:Teaneck, New Jersey/GA1 and have made the changes to the article as indicated in your review. Please take another pass through and let me know if there are any other outstanding issues. Alansohn (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I went through the dead links and we should be all clear here. Let me know about anything else. Alansohn (talk) 01:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Cintio Vitier at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! &spades; B.s.n.  &hearts; R.N. contribs 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK Nomination of I Like Pumpkins
I've expanded the article more to meet the DYK requirement. Thanks for taking the time to review the nomination. Geraldk (talk) 02:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

 * New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
 * Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
 * News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  04:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight newsletter
Hi there. Just a really quick, short note. You're currently listed as a spotlight participant, here, but you are not on the list of people who want to get the newsletter. If you want to receive updates about spotlight, then please add your name on this page. If not, no further action required, and I won't bug you about it again. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  15:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Aengus Finucane
Hello! Your submission of Aengus Finucane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 21:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Featured List Candidate
I nominated List of counties in Missouri to be a featured list, and you made comments at the nomination. I have hopefully resolved your issues, would care to reassess? JUJUTACULAR | TALK 22:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

 * From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
 * Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
 * Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
 * News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
 * Dispatches: Sounds
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

The Sniffing Accountant
Hi Mm40. It’s me, Artichoke-Boy. I’m considering making a DYK on the article The Sniffing Accountant (which is a Seinfeld episode). You told me during math class to notify you when I have expanded the article to a significant extent, so here’s the notification.

Can you see if I expanded the article five-fold? Also, can you tell me which of these possible DYK nominations for the episode you like the best?


 * ...that the main plotline of the Seinfeld episode The Sniffing Accountant was based on an actual instance where Jerry Seinfeld's accountant stole about 50,000 dollars from him to buy illegal narcotics?


 * ...that Larry David continuously felt people’s shirt sleeves between his thumb and forefinger to research for the Seinfeld episode The Sniffing Accountant?


 * ...that Michael Richard’s impressive display of simultaneous drinking and smoking helped him win an Emmy Award for his portrayal of Kramer in The Sniffing Accountant?


 * ...that Larry David worked as a bra salesman during his years as a struggling comedian, thus inspiring a plotline in the Seinfeld episode The Sniffing Accountant?

Thanks a lot.  Artichoke-Boy  (talk) 22:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I’ve continued expanding The Sniffing Accountant, and I’m actually running out of information to put in the article. When you look at the article’s history (or any article’s history, for that matter), there’s a note saying how many bytes the article contains after each edit. Can this be used to determine fivefold expansion? Before I started editing it, the article read "2935 bytes". Does that mean it has to read 14675 bytes for it to be expanded fivefold?  Artichoke-Boy  (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Bill Dovey DYK
Hi. Please feel free to nominate the article for DYK. I normally do self-noms, but you're welcome to do it. Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for MT Unirea
Nice work on the MT Unirea article! Kudos to you, sir! — Kralizec! (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
 * In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

review pr
can you review the Peer review of Family guy.--Pedro J. the rookie 20:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Hummelstown GAN
What all exactly would you recommend for the article? Care to help out? Anything you can point at and decisively say - that needs to be changed? Any comments/additions/thoughts/questions please ask back. Thanks! The Rypcord. 21:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

RE:The Ex-Girlfriend FAC
Thanks, no it wasn't on purpose. I must have forgot about it.-- Music 26/  11  15:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Dan Povenmire/archive1
Hey, I've taken care of your concerns on the FAC. Feel free to check it out.  The Flash  {talk} 20:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you please comment back on the FAC? There are a lot of comments left on the page that have not been struck or anything by the reviewers and it's leading to the page to lean on fail. Thanks,  The Flash  {talk} 21:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Boavista players
Hi there MM, VASCO from Portugal here,

I noticed you created a lot of articles for players for Boavista FC. However, two things strike me: why did you say that this club plays in the Portuguese Liga (first division) when, at the time of your edits - June of 2009 - the club was almost, if not already, relegated to the Portuguese Second Division (the third level)? And, the name of the link you added (SUPERLIGA) does not even exist, as the "replacement" PORTUGUESE PRIMEIRA LIGA...

Please see this edit i composed, Jorge Silva, for better conclusions. From Portugal, have a nice week, happy editing,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Skunk Anansie discography
Hi!, thanks very much for your feedback!. i've addressed the points you have made with a few comments for assistance :). Cheers!. Marcus Bowen (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  14:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Lord Lindley image link
Does this work for you? BencherliteTalk 07:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Personnel section
Does the personnel section really need its own reference? I have encountered reviewers who told me otherwise. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 02:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC))

Vancouver
- Dear FA Team member, we could use your help if you're available. Mkdw talk 06:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Killervogel5
Did you mean to Oppose? - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I meant to support; I was making a joke because the candidate is a Phillies' fan and I'm a Mets' fan (see Mets-Phillies rivalry). I was under the impression that humor was allowed at RfAs. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 16:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/2007 Pan American Games medal table/archive2
Hi Mm40! Could you left your opinion (support or oppose) or new comments on Featured list candidates/2007 Pan American Games medal table/archive2? Regards; <b style="font-size:small; font-family:vivaldi; color:black;">Felipe Menegaz</b> 02:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Gideon Encarnacion
Hmm. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I hadn't noticed that note at the top of Special:NewPages. Was it added recently? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Now that I looked into it a bit, I see the new note was added to MediaWiki:Newpages-summary just three days ago. Well, thanks much for the heads-up. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review
Hi, it’s me, Artichoke-Boy.

I’ve just finished my first GA review, which I decided to do on the Seinfeld episode "The Statue." Here it is, if you want to check it out. --- Artichoke-Boy  (talk)(sign) 21:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, it's looks very good (I'm surprised ). I haven't fully read the article, but most of the suggestions you make are constructive. I suggest that before passing the article, you take another look at the GA criteria. Also, on WP:GAN, another user said they would review the article. Granted, this was 8 days ago and they haven't posted the review yet. You definitely should read the instructions on the top of WP:GAN. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I will. Thanks a lot. --- Artichoke-Boy  (talk)(sign) 21:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Re Yung VL Adw
My apologies for not having made it more clear. I believe if you look at the AfD process about the artist, you may recognize that you had something to do with the attempted speedy deletion of one of his (putative) albums. If you have any questions, I'm at your service. (And if I have REALLY fouled this up, my apologies in advance. I seem to be having a terrible day.) Accounting4Taste: talk 00:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You edited June 21 Da Introduction Of Love AOK! which is also nominated for AfD in the same process. Again, my apologies for not having been clearer; I rarely nominate groups of articles.  Accounting4Taste: talk 00:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, my apologies. I should have looked a bit closer. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam
<div style="width:65em; margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; border:2px solid #E49B0F; background-color:MidnightBlue; padding:5px; margin-left:5px; -moz-border-radius:12px">

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks a lot! Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 01:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Minus signs and sortable tables
&amp;minus; should not be used in sortable tables. It breaks the sorting. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  02:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies; I was unaware of this. Duly noted, Mm40 (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So was I, actually. You aren't the only one who made a good-faith edit and had it reverted.  I've added an html comment to discourage future good-faith editors from making the same change.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  03:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

GA reviews
Hello. I'm quite new at all this and was after a little advice. Having recently nominated an article, Wilfred Rhodes, for GA review, I noticed that the list of nominated articles was growing. I was thinking about trying to review an article, and I would probably stick to sports for the moment. I was thinking about reviewing 1874 FA Cup Final and was after some general advice. My main problem is that I have very little knowledge about football history. Would this be a problem?--Sarastro1 (talk) 10:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ordinarily, reviewing an article you have no knowledge of is fine, perhaps even a benefit (no preconceived notions, you can read it as the average reader does). For your first review, however, it may be best to pick an article you have some idea about (maybe a cricket-related article), so you don't have to get your head around both the article and the actual review. As for the FA Cup final article, you should be fine as long as you know how football is played. In fact, I was thinking of reviewing it, and I'm American.
 * Judging by your fine work on Rhodes, you evidently knows what an article should look like. When I review an article, I first check the quick-fail criteria. Next, I read through the article, noting on the review page any grammatical errors or suggested rewordings (some suggestions here). I like to check for any minor reference formatting errors, but that's just my nitpicking. Finally, I check the reliability of sources, whether the lead does what it needs to, and any images (which may be hard at first, but you get used to it; feel free to ask for help). It also may be a good idea to check for links to disambiguation pages with this and external links with this. A good idea for a new reviewer may be reading through the GA criteria point-by-point and checking against the article being reviewed.
 * I hope that wasn't as long-winded as it seems  But we do need more reviewers, and I'm sure you'll do fine. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 13:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the FA Cup Final article in the end. I would appreciate it if you would have a look and see if I have pitched the review OK. In the end, I just took the plunge. Your advice was very helpful. Cheers.--Sarastro1 (talk) 00:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The review is very much what you should aim for; nice job. The only thing I can comment on is that I don't think the lineup link is broken. The linkchecker isn't always the most accurate, so I always confirm that the links it says are dead actually are. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

A Rugrats Chanukah
I responded to your comments on the FAC for the article. (Sorry if this is a useless ping, I'm not sure if you have the FAC on your watchlist or not) Cheers,  The Flash  <sup style="color:black;">{talk} 17:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

MVP article
Poke poke, how goes it? :) Staxringold talkcontribs 04:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Interesting you ask, I was just about to finish the last table. I thought I was going to do it sometime over the weekend/Thursday/Friday, but I was away from my normal computer. I promise, it will be at FLC by the end of today. I need your opinion, though: am I too concise (i. e. short) with the prose? Particularly with the award descriptions. I've been basing them off the Gillette and Palmer book, but they only have about a paragraph each. But too answer your question, I'm doing 1979 on, redoing the last two stats tables, and clearing up the odds & ends they care about at FLC. Sounds good? Mm40 (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the lead needs a lot more prose as per all the other awards, discussing the multiple winners, consecutive winners, winningest teams, maybe the closest race if you can cite that to voting data, etc. Staxringold talkcontribs 16:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was what I was thinking. Shouldn't be too difficult. On another note, I bet I can get my list promoted before yours! Mm40 (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Which list do you mean, WS champs or NYM Draft picks? Cuz lulz, the draft picks have gotten so little attention, worries me because that's my plan for the Wikicup. Staxringold talkcontribs 18:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I was talking about the WS champs. My point is that the featured topic nomination will have to wait for you, not me. I'll try to give the draft picks a review later; pretty much all FLCs aren't getting enough attention, so I feel obligated to tell you to review some noms. But interesting plan for the Wikicup, makes me think about joining. But I know that real life will take over as soon as it starts. Mm40 (talk) 18:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I dunno what to do with the WS champs list... :/ Staxringold talkcontribs 22:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Great work on this, by the way. Hopefully we can get enough reviews on it to make it happen! KV5 ( Talk  •  Phils ) 13:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you fancy staying in the baseball field but taking a break from this, 2009 World Series is up at peer review in prep for an FAC come the New Year! Staxringold talkcontribs 17:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I was thinking about it, but I saw KV5 was giving a review and I was busy with MVP. Also, I'm planning on starting two DYKs soon (see to-do list on my userpage, one is about a baseball writer), and, err, other things. Don't worry, you'll find out soon; to give you a hint, two other baseball editors have done it recently. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 17:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

FA-Team revival (and dark episode)
Hi, saw a couple of your notes. I'm turning my attention to learning the FA process  at this time, and have seen the alluring quote at the top of WP:FA-TEAM. I found one topic in the AN/I archive, but surely that one isn't the one referred to. Must satisfy my curiosity. lol Do you know how to find the situation mentioned? Thanks. Proofreader77 (interact) 11:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I wasn't around for the original founding of the FA-Team, but I don't think it's an actual quote. I assume it's a parody of The A-Team (whatever that is). You would be better satisfied asking on the team's talk page. Upon looking on Youtube, you can see the original A-team video here. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 13:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Myself as FLC director?
I'm unsure as to whether there was really consensus to name me a director, as indicated when you listed me as one on the FLC instructions here. I opened a thread on this issue on FLC talk here. Please feel free to comment there if you have time.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 00:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

User Name for Admin Attention
By sheer accident, I came across your removal of "Snatchandthumper" from the list as not an issue. I think you may have missed its subtle sexual connotation. "Snatch" is slang for vagina and "thumper", in this context, is slang for an engorged penis. Since it appears this user name was designed to see if it could slip by, you might want to reconsider your decision. Askari Mark (Talk) 01:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I missed that; I'll undo my edit. Thanks for the heads-up, Mm40 (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)