User talk:Mmaabento

May 2018
Hello, I'm Hayman30. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Lonely Together (Avicii song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coldplay. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  04:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thank you for actively working on the One World Together page. Such an inspiring event! How many Wikipedians are watching I wonder? Glad to see all of us watching can come to this page and connect the dots so quickly. You are Essential!! Rock on! DrMel (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dead to Me (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Young Forever (talk)   01:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Continued unexplained editing, lack of sources. Drmies (talk) 13:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2022
Hello, I'm Joyce-stick. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Holy Fvck, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyce-stick (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Anne Heche, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''I reverted your edit because it changed the meaning of a sentence. Perhaps it was a simple error but, in any case, please always provide an edit summary when submitting any change. See WP:FIES. Thank you &mdash;Danorton (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)'' &mdash;Danorton (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Renaissance World Tour, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 16:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 16:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * JSYK, I've reported you for vandalism. I would simply stop at this point. You're violating multiple MOS policies, which we must follow as editors.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 16:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Renaissance World Tour, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 16:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Are you going to respond to any of this? Not very civil or assuming of good faith on your behalf to collaborate on this encyclopedia. Like, I'm genuinely trying to understand the intent behind your edits, which violate MOS terms and template set up, and refusing to discuss simply does not look positive on your behalf.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 16:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing article space for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and a complete failure to respond to or address concerns raised. This is a collaborative project and you have zero user talk page or article talk page contributions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 18:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Ronherry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Eras Tour, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!  ℛonherry  ☘  12:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * How can an act be named after Taylor Swift (Debut) and she played 4 songs by now and only one is from that album? I sourced everything. Mmaabento (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Several sources list "Taylor Swift" as one of the tour's acts/blocks. "How can.." I don't know, ask Swift maybe? Mail her. But as far as Wikipedia is concerned, we stick to the reliable publications here and all of them enlist the debut era as one of the acts. Further edits in contrary to the sources will be considered as disruption. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  20:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Eras Tour. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

April 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bebe (album), you may be blocked from editing.  Ss  112   17:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Avoid using student newspaper as sources
University students are not music critics, so please avoid citing them as if they are. They should be avoided for claims about anything. Also, please utilize ref names in future instead of copying two of the same source onto an article. Thanks.  Ss  112   03:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Alone
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Alone (Kim Petras song) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Alone (Kim Petras and Nicki Minaj song). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 20:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to The Eras Tour did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!  ℛonherry  ☘  21:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Poor Things genre
Hello. I've reverted your edit to the Poor Things film, because there is ongoing discussion on the talk page about that issue at the moment. Before editing it again, it would be great if you could read and contribute to the talk page section. Thanks! Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ratched (TV series)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ratched (TV series), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Mmaabento&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1203325205 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ratched_(TV_series)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1203325205%7CRatched%20(TV%20series)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please don't edit war
Please don't edit war, such as what you did with Beth Garrabrant on The Tortured Poets Department. - Fuzheado &#124; Talk 16:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Soundtrack
Its very normal per WP:MOVIE for a film page to include the soundtrack to said film. It doesn't need the full information about the album as that has its own page. Every song from the album is featured in the movie and it is described as a musically-narrative driven film. Do not remove this content again. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 07:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * But the soundtrack needs to be what’s in the film, not her full album. Mmaabento (talk) 08:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What you have said is makes no sense, unless you've misunderstood - the album was created and the film was made to encompass all the songs and instead of creating seperate music videos she created the movie. The soundtrack to a film is the music which appears in the film. The entire film was written because of the album. It even shares the name with the album. All of the songs are featured in move. This is called a soundtrack. You need to research soundtrack versus Music Inspired by albums. Either way, you were bold and reverted. Per WP:BRD you were reverted. That means you do not repeat the same edit again. The onus is on you to go to the talkpage and get a consensus for your edits. Until or unless there is a consensus, for your edits, they should not be added to the article again, i.e. you should not remove the section again. If you do remove the section without proof of a consensus this now constitute a WP:EDITWAR. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 00:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you point me in the direction where it says "soundtracks to a film must be listed in the order that they appear?" or where you think you're above wikipedia rules around WP:BRD. When you are reverted, you are supposed to stop and start a discussion first. I added the information, you removed it and I reverted you. Your edits should have stopped there and that's where discussion should start. I'd kindly suggest you restore the edit and open a discussion. See MOS:FILMMUSIC. If your main argument is "they don't appear in the same order as the album track list" then go out of your way to reorder them but simply removing is unacceptable since this is a musically driven-project and the two things are inextricably linked. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 01:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The album is actually not soundtrack to the film. The film was created, because the album exists and not the other way around. Therefore, the film accompanying the album and these songs were not created specifically for the filme. Instead, the film was created specifically to match the content of the songs that’s already existed before the film was done. Mmaabento (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * None of that explains why you are right or answers the questions I asked you. Procedural your edits are still incorrect per WP:BRD, even if you disagree about the content. You're not supposed to undo an edit when you have been reverted. You have a responsibility to leave the edit you disagree with and seek a WP:CONSENSUS. A score or soundtrack - ether as explained by MOS:FILMMUSIC are normal to be included in an article about a film. A Love Story was created to tell the story of the music therefore the songs featured should be included on the page, if in a list at the very least if not as a full track list. Either way, your editing behaviour leads a lot to be desired. I can see you seem to be a newer editor given by your first talkpage comment date- I would highly suggest that you start a discussion on the talkpage and restore the edit in the meantime, as you're in violation of WP:BRD. We don't go off "I disagree for this reason... I can't cite any guidelines or discussion but I'm going to continually revert and ignore the rules or expectations of editors" which is basically what you have done. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 21:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Here you have an example how a soundtrack is usually written on a film page, the songs are in order of appearance and are not a copy -> past the whole content from the album page and its tracklist with unnecessary information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Side_Story_(2021_film) Mmaabento (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid argument. It still doesn't excuse your behaviour or explain why its okay to ignore WP:BRD. West Side Story wasn't written to showcase the music so its not the same at all. Your blatant ignorance of how to edit (the content of the edit is up for discussion) is disrespectful. Its not me you need to discuss with, its on the talkpage and gain a WP:CONSENSUS. Simply removing the content because you can't be arsed to reformat it is lazy. Reverting when WP:BRD is in force is blatantly disrespectful and disregards how to collaborate. I repeat, please revert the edit, take it to the talk page and discuss. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 12:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of songs recorded by the Pussycat Dolls. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello. I'm here to inform you about your edits, which another user has reverted, on List of Spotify streaming records. You did not cite a reliable source, and it seemed to violate a neutral point of view. Take this time to review the Wikipedia guidelines and add reliable sources while keeping a neutral point of view. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 05:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Atlas (2024 film).  Mike  Allen   22:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)