User talk:Mmarsenault

Your sandbox page
Hello, Lashresource, and welcome to Wikipedia. I have added a box at the top of your sandbox. This contains a link for you to submit the page for review as a Wikipedia article when you think it is ready. Please note, however, that articles are only accepted when they cite adequate sources to support the information given, and to show that the subject of the article is what we call "notable". More information about article creation can be found at our "first article" page. There is more about Wikipedia editing in general on this help page. If you have any questions, the Teahouse is there to help newer editors. Regards Noyster  (talk),  23:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lashresource/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lashresource/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lashresource/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lashresource/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lashresource/sandbox


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Lashresource/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. The Bushranger One ping only 07:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 07:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. What sources will you be using? MER-C 21:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Globally renamed 'Lashresource' to 'Mmarsenault'. Just Chilling (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Although fake eyelashes (known as strip lashes) have been around for a long time (as is mentioned in the Eyelash Extension page, it was patented in 1911 by Ana Taylor), Eyelash Extensions (the art of using an adhesive to apply one or more extensions to a person’s lash individually), specifically, are fairly new, so sources are limited to companies and online sources that work in the continuously evolving industry. Reviewing the citations for the current Eyelash Extension Page (except for historical information) the other citations are from websites owned by businesses in the industry, bloggers, eBooks, and other external websites. That said, I believe I could offer more depth and updated information to the existing "Eyelash Extensions" page and would use a variety of sources unless I refer to historical information, but I believe the Author covered that section well. For instance, I would link to eyelash hair growth phases already explained in other Wikipedia pages, I would add the other types of materials utilized that are not listed, I would add eyelash extension technique types, I would add the curls types, thickness, and lengths of extensions, I would add info on who is a candidate for extensions (not everyone can have them), I would add information regarding the likely culprits if people have a bad reaction to them (and would cite medical sources), I think a section on alternatives to eyelash extensions would be appropriate for those who are not candidates, I would add information on the adhesive cure period, I would add information on whether contacts or glasses are appropriate for eyelash extension wearers, etc. I also noticed that in the current Eyelash Extension page, it specifically refers to California’s licensing requirements, so I would reference all the other government state pages, as the author did in the page for California. In case you are wondering, I am not a lash extension artist. I was a software engineer, and I am a licensed customs broker. But, due to my love for lashes I invented a patent-pending tool for eyelash extension wearers to protect their extensions, which is why I know so much about the subject. Any advice you have to offer me to be successful in this forum, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you in advance. Lashresource (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)lashresource