User talk:Mmaster12345

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mmaster12345/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Mmaster12345/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Mmaster12345/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Mmaster12345/sandbox


Hello, Mmaster12345. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Li Cunxin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Li Cunxin was changed by Mmaster12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909952 on 2016-03-14T00:05:35+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Li Cunxin. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Li Cunxin was changed by Mmaster12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893722 on 2016-03-15T00:27:19+00:00.

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zulu people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zulu people was changed by Mmaster12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961253 on 2016-06-02T04:29:48+00:00.

November 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dave Grohl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Willondon (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Potato has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Potato was changed by Mmaster12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950045 on 2017-03-02T03:11:45+00:00.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Potato, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 03:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The first two edits by this account (in 2015) look OK. The rest appear to have been silly vandalism. I can't see a way that you can prove that the editor of 2015 is not also the editor of 2016/7. I don't think even our Checkusers can read the password on a computer, and anyway, that could be done by 2016/7 as easily as 2015 (naming the editors by their years of operation. It seems odd to me that after two years of inactivity you (2015) have suddenly reappeared to make good edits and found you had been blocked. I'm commenting rather than declining, because others more technical might be able to suggest a way we can be certain that you are indeed the creator of this account and not the alleged 'hijacker'. Peridon (talk) 11:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for helping Peridon, but it looks like it won't matter anyway.