User talk:Mmgalitz

Image:Shinichi-suzuki-violin-suzuki-method-suzuki-music.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Shinichi-suzuki-violin-suzuki-method-suzuki-music.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Richard Coff
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Richard Coff, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.violinist.com/directory/bio.cfm?member=rcoff. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Shinichi-suzuki-violin-suzuki-method-suzuki-music.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Shinichi-suzuki-violin-suzuki-method-suzuki-music.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Richard Coff
A tag has been placed on Richard Coff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tiddly -  Tom  06:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Coff
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Richard Coff, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable, no references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Brianyoumans (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)