User talk:Mmjcanchew

Your submission at AfC Medical Marijuana Inc. (August 17)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tazerdadog (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medical Marijuana Inc. concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medical Marijuana Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medical Marijuana Inc.


Hello Mmjcanchew. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Medical Marijuana Inc.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Greenfields School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

27 June 2014: mention of Mark McQuade
Update regarding Greenfields School

There are two separate issues here:

1. There is no mention of Mr. McQuade in this Independent article, so that is no a valid reason for leaving the unfavourable mention of him in the Wiki entry on the school.

2. The mention of the offense committed by another Mark, Mark Kent, should also be removed in my opinion.

There is a new European law concerning the Right to Be Forgotten.

That sex offense was was committed 20 years ago and by an ex-employee of the school, not the school itself. The school have had very strict criteria as to who they hire ever since and while that was a very unfortunate incident, it is many years in the past.

The new Right to be Forgotten, which is a Human Rights ruling concerning Google should also be considered.

http://www.innov8tiv.com/google-set-ups-webform-europeans-giving-individuals-right-forgotten/

Plus the fact that in the UK, 7 years after a prison sentence is served, a person who was convicted of the offense is no longer obliged to disclose their criminal activity, as they are considered rehabilitated, I think that it is fair to ask Wikipedia to consider removing the link to that very old article and the reference to it in the Wiki page.

http://hub.unlock.org.uk/knowledgebase/detailedguideroa/

So, please push on the above two grounds, for Wikipedia to remove the two points, using the above as ammunition and let me know how that goes and if you need more information to back up your case.

I have done an extensive Google search for Mark Kent as a sexual offender and found nothing in the main database which is here:

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com//?s=mark+kent&search=Go

If you do a Google search for "mark+kent sexual offender UK", not only does nothing come up but at the bottom of the page is this comment by Google (referring to the Right to be Forgotten ruling).

So, it doesn't seem to be fair for the school to have this information freely available about them on Wikipedia when the person who committed the crime is now considered to have that behind him.

Mmjcanchew (talk) 11:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

30 June 2014: Further edit of the Greenfields article/ mention of Mark McQuade
I have deleted the following entry from the Greenfields School as it is unsubstantiated but our recent report has thoroughly substantiated information:

In 1985 Inspectors from the Department for Education who toured Greenfields noted: "Many children are reading, and certainly writing, at a level below what they might be expected to achieve.", despite the school claiming that the students were over a year ahead in reading.

Mmjcanchew (talk) 10:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Added more information to Greenfields
Added more information to Greenfields School from the following link under references: http://www.isc.co.uk/schools/england/sussex-east/forest-row/greenfields-independent-school.

Mmjcanchew (talk) 11:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

3 July 2014
Amended and updated the wiki Greenfields School

Mmjcanchew (talk) 13:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

additional information: 9 September 2014
Added more useful information on Greenfields School including GCSE league tables data. Mmjcanchew (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

update text with non-advertorial wording
Mmjcanchew (talk) 12:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

There's an alert above the text for this article stating "This article appears to be written like an advertisement". I have revised the article and I do not see the article being written like an ad. Could a wiki staff please point me in the right direction? Thank you Mmjcanchew (talk) 12:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

added more promotional content
I have added more promotional content to the article using a neutral tone of voice. If there is an issue with the text, could wiki staff please add a note with more information. Thank you Mmjcanchew (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion, as you did at Greenfields School‎. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)