User talk:Mmmmsmith

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Take (December 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Take and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Miss_Take Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Miss_Take reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this response. This is my first attempt at creating an article, so I am learning as I go. I wanted to ask for clarification - the first part of the reply I received above indicates that the references need to be "multiple published sources that are: in depth, reliable, secondary and independent." But then your comment indicates that the article fails the "General Notability Guideline."
 * The notability guidelines state that, "Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet." I am continuing to research the history of this plane, and I am finding additional sources that I believe bolster the case for notability. I was also hopeful that this article could be a way for others interested in this topic to add additional information.
 * Is the problem that the sources referenced are not in-depth, reliable, secondary, and independent; or is the problem more of a concern about general notability, that the article is just a collection of information that is not necessarily of enough note to warrant a separate Wikipedia article?
 * Thanks for any guidance you might provide! Mmmmsmith (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Miss Take
Hello, Mmmmsmith. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miss Take, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Take


Hello, Mmmmsmith. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss Take".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC)