User talk:Mmorris95/Anaerobic corrosion

Lead Section: This is a robust lead section. Overall, the content is sufficient to provide a meaningful intro to the topic of anaerobic corrosion. My only feedback here might be to link ‘oxidize’, ‘anaerobic’, and ‘anaerobic’ with ‘oxidization’, ‘anaerobic respiration’, and ‘aerobic respiration’, respectively. Adding these links in could help with building out the connectivity of your lead section (and overall article).

Article Structure: The flow of this article is very well established. We start with the lead, we enter chemical mechanisms, within chemical mechanisms we separately discuss anaerobic and aerobic processes, and we conclude with the environmental significance of anaerobic corrosion. Most notably your method of breaking spending time on the abiotic and the biotic was much appreciated.

Balance of Coverage: Topics presented within this article appeared to be served with equal care. As mentioned, we see that the biotic and abiotic mechanisms of anaerobic corrosion were given equal address. Further, the environmental impact was not overdrawn which is much appreciated and leads into points towards neutral content. My only consideration might be addressing industrial impacts of anaerobic corrosion (if any).

Neutral Content: Anaerobic corrosion appeared to be described with neutral tone and without unnecessary bias. Especially in the case of environmental considerations, it is difficult to walk the fine line of environmental discussion without fixating too heavily on various industries or policies. The fact that there is no diversion from the science makes for a pleasant read.

Reliable Sources: All sources leveraged within this article appear legitimate and well derived. We also see that the sources are appropriately used and not duplicated. Overall, the references within this article are substantive and, importantly, recent in the case of Hall et al. (2021).