User talk:Mmovchin/archived

About Last Edit
I didn't do anything wrong. I just made an edit. It wasn't unconstructive in any way. I was stating facts and not opinions. Honest. How did you find about me so quick? I'm stating that because of my own experiences and I wanted to share the knowledge to improve the article better. (RuckusJorgee (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC))
 * Hello RuckusJorgee,
 * you gave no source for your change! In addition, it sounds (to me) as nonsense. IP addresses are assigned to routers and modems. Not to single computers! --mmovchin Talk 17:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I was told by people who at least run the site my friend was on that a different computer will have their own IP address. So I thought I'd confirm it on the Wiki to get mods everywhere to read. Not just friends. (RuckusJorgee (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC))

Nervous laughter
And the Huggle glitch strikes again. Slight Smile  03:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry. Stupid Huggle bug -.- --mmovchin Talk 03:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz
Hi. Just thought I'd let you know that I've declined your G1 nomination of Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz. The G1 criterion is very narrow, and should generally only be applied to pages consisting of incomprehensible gibberish with no meaningful content. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool 03:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Tracy Beaker Returns character list.
Hi, There is no need to list the Tracy Beaker Returns characters on the main article as they are already listed in depth on a separate article. Regards --Mr tompty (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Plant Delights article
My apologies for jumping the gun as I didn't see the news article citation. I reverted earlier edits as vandalism related to a controversy manufactured by a small number of Penn State supporters on Facebook. Now that it has made it into the news I suppose it's fair game so I will refrain from further editing (although I still believe it lacks notability). Please keep an eye on this article as these people have targeted and smeared Mr. Avent (whose business partner/wife died just last week) and his business in a wide variety of media. Here is another article that may provide more in-depth and balanced information about the controversy: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/24/1879485/nursery-catalog-sets-off-firestorm.html (BTW I have no connection to the business, except as a past customer.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

1
I did not vandalize anything, please check before you send out warnings for vandalism. I edited my post one minute after I posted it because I forgot a line. Please remove notice immediately, thank you. Ryan (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

2
It wasn't an unconstructive edit. I changed a candidate from his old district to his new one. Keeping current information helps ensure accuracy on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.78.168.240 (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Huh?
Curious about your edits to User talk:Raabbustamante and the articles he created. Your reversal of his changes restored more of the copyright violation which he was (admittedly not very effectively) starting to clean up. Choess (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This edit was without any sources so I reverted it. (Verifiability).
 * And this looks like a deletion of good sources.
 * And nobody is permitted to delete any contributions from wikipedia, also his own becuase they're all published under GFDL and CC-BY-SA.--mmovchin Talk 20:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you read Criterion G7 for speedy deletion? Did you read the banner at the top of the first page that said it was nominated for speedy deletion due to copyright violation? When someone removes text that violates copyright, do you think it is a good idea to put that text back into the page? Choess (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request mmbot
Someone has marked Bots/Requests for approval/mmbot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place  anywhere on this page.
 * . --mmovchin Talk 15:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail
-- Kangaroo  powah  05:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅.--mmovchin Talk 10:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied there. -- Kangaroo  powah  01:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks :) --mmovchin Talk 23:22, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * They sure were weird edits!--5 albert square (talk) 23:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)