User talk:Mmunji1

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia.

Hobart meetup
Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information. This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hobart area articles
Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hampshire, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodchip. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devonport, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geilston Bay, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Baines & Co., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Ball Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Mooreville, Tasmania) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mooreville, Tasmania, Mmunji1!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"thank you for uploading tis article. It provides some information, but is still a bit short. Does it have a school? Where do people work? Does it have a pub or shop? You made me intersted, indeed!"

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Something needs to be noted
Gunns Plains cannot just be left as it is, are you sure you know what you are up to? JarrahTree 11:58, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * some editors take cut and paste moves very seriously, and chastise horribly. If there is a reason for what oyu are doing you must leave adequate edit summaries to let someone watching know what you are up to.JarrahTree 12:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

The wiki project of Australia requires all place names to be place name, state. All article links have been diverted and the content moved. Some editors had a redirect on the proper page. I was not sure of which delete commands to use. Please advise. Blank articles have been deleted for me in the past. Mmunji1 (talk) 12:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Simple, create a redirect page instead - check my edit. If only your assertion about state name was true. Much blood has been spilt over WP:PRIMACY and other weird beasts that create single name location names with no state qualifiers. Be very careful about cut and paste. Keep up the good work. JarrahTree 12:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

checking
Has anyone walked your through or guided you through the issues of WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:TONE ? JarrahTree 12:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * it might be easier to say - have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston_Beach,_Tasmania - it was reference free and in the cleanup listing - and see the history of what got added.  It is very important for an article to have information than can be sourced/referenced - as text with nothing to verify can be considered WP:OR and can be removed as that.  Anecdotal material cannot be left in articles unless there is a WP:CITE or WP:RS. (have a close look at Trove is my suggestion) Keep up the good work!!!   JarrahTree 13:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of West Coast, Tasmania
Hi I note you have created this category Category:Suburbs of West Coast, Tasmania. However none of these would be counted as suburbs. They could be termed settlements, inhabited locations, localities. Many of these are now deserted so could not be called towns or villages any more. So I am suggestion that you come up with a better category name! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Having lived in one of the suburbs, and created most of the articles incorporated, I strongly object to the category, rather than individually remove all items from the category - I have taken the category to CFD/rename, with the suggestion of the term community and have given the reasoning there. Please feel free to comment, there... thanks. JarrahTree 09:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of West Coast, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of West Coast, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 09:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Circular Head Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Circular Head Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Meander Valley Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Meander Valley Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Kentish Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Kentish Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Meander Valley Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Meander Valley Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 00:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Creation of suburbs categories
DO NOT keep creating new categories containing the word "suburbs", or adding pages to these categories until the discussions about their names are resolved. Wikipedia relies on consensus to make decisions on what to do. When it becomes apparent that your edits are controversial you must stop and talk about them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Northern Midlands Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Northern Midlands Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 01:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Southern Midlands Council Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Southern Midlands Council Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 01:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Derwent Valley Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Derwent Valley Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 01:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Central Highlands Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Central Highlands Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 02:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Kingborough Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Kingborough Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 02:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Suburbs of Huon Valley Council, Tasmania has been nominated for discussion
Category:Suburbs of Huon Valley Council, Tasmania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 02:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Categorry:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Categorry:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania. Since you had some involvement with the Categorry:Suburbs of Waratah-Wynyard Council, Tasmania redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Naraht (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JarrahTree 01:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Warning
You have spent the last couple of days adding a type of listing that has not been resolved.

You should try to request an uninterested or uninvolved admin somewhere to specifically review the issues, or take the issue to be resolved at a higher level (if you dont know the process, ask, look around), rather than create further categories which are not in WP:AGF. As there has been such a hiatus, the issue is now being raised at the Australian noticeboard.

WP:CIVILITY AND WP:AGF are strongly advised, as WP:PA simply weakens any possibility of your case being heard. The best way to further your cause is to show consistent usage of the word suburb for all localities in another state of australia.

When an admin like Graham Bartlett reverts your usage - and your WP:EDITWAR by calling his reverts WP:VANDALISM it further weakens your case.

Understand that on the mainland the issue of terminology was established and determined years ago and has been in place with consistency. For you to create a whole state of suburbs is WP:OR and not backed up in any of the mainland usages.

Note that in the early stage of your limited response to messages you had a notion of you have to live here to edit about argument. Most of wikipedia would have never been written if that is the case, it is not in any sense a condition of editing.

Please understand that when standards are established, consistency - in Australia, is an important part of how the whole of wikipedia works. Consistency of terms like suburb and locality is essential. Creating a whole new set of terms that no one else uses is disruptive, and not what wikipedia is WP:ABOUT JarrahTree 01:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Please note I am using the Australian Bureau of Statistics as the Source of the Information and Data. This is a higher respected government body and does recognize the areas as state suburbs Mmunji1 (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * WP:RS has nothing to do with higher, or respect, or whatever - if you have proof that all the localities, towns and otherwise are suburbs - take it to where others can review this discussion - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board

And stop adding until the issue is resolved or you will be blocked as a bad faith editor JarrahTree 02:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

I have proven the use of suburbs on the Mainland and am being consistent.

It is Graeme's conduct that should be reviewed. It does say that categories should not be emptied.

There is no timeline for resolution. You have not represented your case either and have added this to the case. Mmunji1 (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

General editing conduct when something is under review - is in WP:AGF to stop until all of it is resolved.

You have proved nothing. You have not provided a consisten usage of the the word 'suburb' for a whole state on the mainland, and to talk about a source as higher or respect, is not the same as a very specific WP:RS or exact link.

The discussion is now national due to the long time of no one either reviewing the issue or closing the discussion one way or other - look up your talk page - there is a list of categories which are questioned, and they have not been closed. JarrahTree 02:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and if you cannot handle a few comments and call them harassment, that is your call.

some times discussions on wikipedia are required to resolve issues, if simply raising some points and templating each other, is not going to resolve the issue, maybe we should drop them now and find a solution to your creations.

What you have done in your 'suburbs of tasmania' may well be legitimate in your eyes, and it may well be well reasoned, the problem is there is nothing to qualify the usage either on the main space part of the category pages for a user to understand what you have done. To go back to the original notice from queenstown suburbs is well beyond it now. To simply state 'higher' and respected' is not the way to resolve an issue on wikipedia. what you could have done would be to simply replicated the abs reasoning, so one could see that suburbs in tasmania dont actually exist - they are a statistical construct by the abs, and that in the strictest sense it is a dangerous notion to apply to categories - as the categories usually refer an abs construct, not what is on the ground - it is a hypithetical statistical construct. which is why the original category challenge was created - queenstown and the west coast localities are not 'suburbs' in reality - only in abs terms.

Which is why I stand by my original issue - these are all 'statisitical' entities and as such are of no practical usage to wikipedia as it stands - unless you have the editorial sense to go to each category you have created and leave a link to the specific abs web page that explains the 'constructs' and outside would think that the town, locacility, 2 horse settlement is in fact a 'suburb' as is used colloquially on the mainland - a part of a metro area. JarrahTree 03:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I have changed one of your categories to Category:Localities of Central Coast, Tasmania, as I have managed to beat the deletion / rename nomination. Really none of those regional area categories should be called suburbs, just because the ABS uses the term.  The idea is for the category to be useful and use a name that others would identify with. Your idea to categorise by the LGA is a good idea. But if someone saw Suburbs of Central Coast, Tasmania, they are not going to expect to see the villages and towns in that council are they? So that is why I think "localities" is a better term. Even though I an an admin, I am not going to use administrator tools to do any blocking or deleting in relation to this as I am involved in the issue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Not only does the Australian Bureau of Statistics use the term suburbs, so does Australia Post. Your term villages is used differently in Tasmania, mainly referring to shopping areas within a suburb. A have many examples. The term community is a better term than village. Suburbs is a term for all entities within a local government area.Mmunji1 (talk) 01:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The ABS does not define suburbs that way, in fact they do the opposite, see Gazetted Localities & State Suburbs which distinguishes between what is a suburb and what is a locality. --Canley (talk) 05:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note

 * There is nothing in the original CFD or set of subsequent rename items that shows the subject/problem has been resolved or closed - due process in usual practice on wikipedia is to respect the consensus of the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_12#Category:Suburbs_of_West_Coast.2C_Tasmania - see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Tasmania - there is comment from experienced wikipedians that needs to be taken in context. JarrahTree 01:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ambleside, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mersey River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Tasmanian locations
Hi Mmunji1.

Thanks for creating some more locality articles for Tasmania. I am surprised that Quoiba had no article as I can remember this from many years ago. Does Quoiba mean wombat? Perhaps you should take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners to see how to add inline citations to your new creations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Local government areas of Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Coast Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hobart Historic Cruises


The article Hobart Historic Cruises has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no evidence for notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 01:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hobart Historic Cruises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Arthur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hobart_Historic_Cruises check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hobart_Historic_Cruises?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Incat Crowther Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Incat Crowther Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women's rugby union in Tasmania


A tag has been placed on Category:Women's rugby union in Tasmania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Category:Women's rugby union in Tasmania, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Talkback
– PeeJay 06:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC) – PeeJay 06:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC) – PeeJay 07:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)