User talk:Mnanonymous

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 11:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharlieEchoTango  ( contact ) 04:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Ade Olufeko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! πr2 (t • c) 06:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Visual Collaborative
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Visual Collaborative, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ade Olufeko. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ade Olufeko, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ade Olufeko was changed by Mnanonymous (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973941 on 2011-12-28T01:35:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Two images
I notice that File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg is similar to but not exactly the same as File:Visual Collaborative.jpg. I processed a copyright permission for the former. Does it make sense to delete the latter, as I see no need for two, almost identical images of the same subject?-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  12:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your request at Commons OTRS noticeboard was moved to OTRS noticeboard. I've commented there.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  12:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Visual Collaborative.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Visual Collaborative.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Advice
Please read Notability, Verifiability, and Conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Redesigned Visual Collaborative Corp Synergy Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Redesigned Visual Collaborative Corp Synergy Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Adé Olufeko
Thanks for reviewing the Aricle, there were two reasons for earlier consensus to mere the article with Visual Collaborative


 * 1) Most of the References were citing Visual Collaborative (An Institute Founded by Adé Olufeko in 2006)
 * 2) There were not much independent references citing the contents of  Adé Olufeko independently

Two major Changes been made


 * 1) Name of the Article corrected from "Ade Olufeko" to "Adé Olufeko"
 * 2) Independent References added (Earlier there were only 5) to support the subject, and to meet the "Notability" guideline

It would be a great help if you review the Article again, and review the merger of a "Living Biography" with an "Institute". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usatechnologist (talk • contribs) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * , merger proposals are subject to a community discussion that runs for at least a week, possibly longer if no consensus has been reached by then. In the end, an uninvolved editor (one who has not participated) will assess the consensus and close the discussion. You are welcome to participate in the discussion (in fact you already did so), but it will not be cut short. Huon (talk) 00:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)