User talk:Mnemo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 00:53, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Is Junger-mania orcandesis really a type of moss? Is there anything more we can say about it? All your base are belong to us 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Jack McClellan
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jack McClellan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jack McClellan fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Jack McClellan and James McClellan are different people, implausible redirect To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jack McClellan, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jack McClellan itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

ECIS
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I reverted this edit because I don't see how the ECIS could know that for sure. They are not part of the European Commission, so they would not have access to that information, would they? —Remember the dot (talk) 02:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Critic (software)


The article Critic (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No third party sources, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC) MrOllie (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Birdfoot Trefoil listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Birdfoot Trefoil. Since you had some involvement with the Birdfoot Trefoil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Open Java Interface


The article Open Java Interface has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this passes Notability (software)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:02, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Labeled Security Protection Profile for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Labeled Security Protection Profile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Labeled Security Protection Profile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DecorumForum125 (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)