User talk:Mnemopis

Your edit to Bruce Klein
Your recent edit to Bruce Klein (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 06:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Your blanking of Hugo de Garis
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Hugo de Garis. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- Schaefer (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Barack Obama
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tvoz | talk 00:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please don't abuse deletion nominations
Your nomination of The Hedonistic Imperative was unwarranted. A poorly written or cited article is not grounds for deletion. It is grounds for clean-up. Please remove the template from the article. It is a notable subject and the information in there, while it may not be encyclopedic (because it hasn't had the benefit of any really good editors) it is ceratinly not nonsense. Please read policy on deletion nominations before adding templates. Brentt 16:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're entitled to your opinion, but it doesn't change the fact that it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. It's a sophomoric essay and does not meet Wikipedia standards.  Mnemopis 17:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * In general it's better not to judge the notability of articles in subjects you have little knowledge of, as you seem to have done with Anders Sandberg as well (as I noted in a comment on the nomination to delete, Sandberg is notable because of his position in the transhumanist movement, not because of his academic publications). I'd wager that most people with a significant level of interest in transhumanism would be familiar with both The Hedonistic Imperative and Anders Sandberg, both are mentioned in several published books about transhumanism (see Google book search results for "Hedonistic Imperative" +"David Pearce"). Hypnosifl 06:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, the irony! ;) Mnemopis 06:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)