User talk:Mnowak4

Logo
Hi. Firstly, role accounts are not allowed so please review and have this account tied to one person. Secondly, as this account is clearly linked to the SOA, please review Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest. Lastly, the use of a logo to identify an organization is accepted fair use; please do not remove it. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. We will change the name of account as it is for just one person. How best do we correct information that is factually incorrect about the organization? We offered these edits to correct the number of members, mission/vision and update the image to our current logo (the seal is different than the logo). Thank you much. SOAmembercomms (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is just for one person, why do you use the plurals "we" and "our" four times in the next three sentences???? -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Avi, for the logo, it is an old, outdated logo. It can still be posted, but can someone else post the new one that has been available for three years also? I know I can't add it based on Wikipedia's policies. Thanks.

User name has been changed, and is attributed solely to myself as an individual and no other organization nor person. I intend to suggest changes to incorrect factual content on company related info through Wikipedia-authorized protocol as previously mentioned. I would like to contribute to Wikipedia on a variety of subjects involving communications and general business topics. Thanks. - Mike

June 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

renmae
I'd be more comfortable it the new user name did not include "comms". Makes it sound like a role account for a department in charge of communications.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * This username is in use. Please amend the template with a new name. As previously requested, please check here for availability before re-submitting. Just Chilling (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Please make subsequent comments without the unblock request formatting, as you only need one open request at a time. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

globally renamed SOAmembercomms to Mnowak4
it is ✅-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 06:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

content in articles
You may suggest changes in articles with which you are connected but remember, content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)