User talk:Mns1111

RattanIndia
Hello Mns1111. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to RattanIndia, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mns1111. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, just received a message from you.
 * I edited the page two times, in the first one i mentioned the reason of edit.
 * To explain further, I did this because the specific content shows the company in negative light. Out of the 3 subject lines of the whole page, one is negative, meaning 33%.
 * On the other side, most of the articles about the company are not considered to be mentioned, which showed conflict of interest. I also wanted to know the basis of content selection. Mns1111 (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Only one sentence in the article discusses RattanIndia in a negative light. I consider this to be due weight. As required by Wikimedia Terms of Use, please disclose whether you have a conflict of interest with the company or have received or expect to receive compensation for your edits. Cunard (talk) 07:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cunard. I noticed that you recently removed content from RattanIndia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)