User talk:Mnshy

Wrong attribution?
Hi, in this change you attributed changes to Philafrenzy when you appear to have reverted Gwil. Was this a mistake? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Please be more careful with your editing and avoid accusing others of vandalism in edit summaries. Vsmith (talk) 15:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Fæ and Vsmith,

I probably hit the wrong button or link by mistake (I'm very new to editing). There is nothing wrong with Gwil's editing and thanks to both of you on this respect. Actually, I'm referring to this change.

Is the external link to "New Stamps of the World" considered an advertising but link to "StampNews.com" is not? On my last search on Wikipedia I found that there are 23 external links to StampNews.com from Wikipedia articles. Some of the links are questionable of its intention.

Personally, I feel that link to "New Stamps of the World" is useful to stamp collectors because the website provides updates on new stamp issues in the form of links to original source of information. See for example at "http://www.nsotw.info/latest.html" and "http://www.nsotw.info/upcoming.html" I think it's probably best to leave it to both of you or other editors to decide :)

Mnshy (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Can I change or rephrase the edit summary so that I will not put any accusation to anyone anymore? If I can do that, how? Do I need to use the undo button next to my edit history? I'm worried of hitting the wrong link again. Thanks. Mnshy (talk) 04:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've removed the edit summary as it involved an unsubstantiated attack on another editor and was unrelated to your actual edit. The summary can still be viewed by admins should there be questions. Please be more careful in the future. Vsmith (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)