User talk:Mnwilk5385/sandbox

Peer Review - Sadie Eller
You do a good job at remaining unbiased, and your article is well organized. There is lots of information included in your article. There are some questions you could answer such as "What was his message?" What was the situation he was trying to fix?" and "What exactly made him a famous individual?" You could reword some sentences to make your article appear less like an essay. Also, you could add another source to balance out your article even more.

Peer Review Emily Tran
You have a lot of good information on your article. You could maybe talk about each country he's been in and his contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entran5820 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Nick Lance
Overall you did a great job at adding only the crucial information. You remained unbiased and well organized. I would have like to seen some answers or support to things you said, as Sadie said above. Also the text does seem very essay like. Maybe a more casual approach would be more appropriate. Your sources are reliable and all work. Your information is also up to date and is pretty intriguing. Overall a very thorough article, just a couple of changes would make it even better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick S. Lance (talk • contribs) 15:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)