User talk:Mnystrand

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Dialogic learning
I don't know how this is done, but "Dialogic learning" should be deleted. The author is completely misinformed about the scholarly traditions of Bakhtin's dialogism, ca. 1918, and confuses the category with Socractic dialogue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnystrand (talk • contribs) 22:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello Mnystrand! Talk:Dialogic learning is the right way to seek consensus through discussion, so you're already on the right path. However, deletion should not be sought if the article can be fixed: we should instead improve it by rewriting (thus fixing) the irrelevant sections. Your previous efforts are misunderstood as vandalism by a bot, and it was written like an essay (sentences like "Yet can we validly claim that some instruction is more dialogic than others? After all, isn't the fundamental premise of dialogism that all language is dialogic, even discourse we might be inclined to call monologic?" do not have an encyclopedic tone). So rather than changing the whole article at once, try to fix the misrepresented sentences and thus gradually fix the article. You might want to read FIXTHEPROBLEM, INCITE, TONE, OR and Be bold. Feel free to ask any questions you might have here or at Teahouse/Questions. (at the end of your comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes (~), like this: ~ to sign them. I will now use four tildes to sign this comment:) Nimuaq (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dialogically Organized Instruction concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dialogically Organized Instruction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dialogically Organized Instruction concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dialogically Organized Instruction, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dialogically Organized Instruction


Hello Mnystrand. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dialogically Organized Instruction".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)