User talk:Mo0/Archive2

RE: SUPER SPEED!
Heh thanks for trying! I have updated my vandal count thing, it is contained in a subpage, here. Thanks again, Fir  e  Fo  x  19:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Gold farmer
Hmm... the issue that would come into play here is probably Cite sources. If 205.219.133.241 wishes to add information such as this or this, he should provide reliable sources to ensure it doesn't violate WP:NPOV or WP:NOR, whatever the editor's intentions may be. Hope this helps. Regards, Sango 123 (talk)  02:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Closing AFDs
I appreciate you closing AFD debates, but please add the top tag above the header with the name of the article as I did in Articles for deletion/Pomparius. - Mgm|(talk) 12:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

'sup Mo0?
OMG! You are at teh Wikipedias! LET'S EDIT SOME PAGES --Kaleb.G 03:57, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Crystal Palace AfD debate.
Thanks for participating, although that more or less goes without saying.

I won't argue with you on the weak delete vote, as that's your prerogative and I'm nobody to comment on that. I have, however, made a few addenda to my nomination to clarify the point. I hate being seen as capricious and arbitrary--I try not to be, y'know?--so I've done my best to explain why the nomination was made. Thought you might want to take a look, just to remove any potential appearance of bad faith, et cetera.

Thanks much and happy editing. Tom Lillis 11:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

The 50 is for concurrent users, not total users. The owner claims to have over two thousand active users right now, and tens of thousands of unique accounts having been created over its history. Active is defined as having logged in within the past few months. 68.83.85.175 15:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

But you need 5,000 concurrent users to qualify for Wikipedia. Ergo, around 100-150 users on at a time. It's a pretty clear guideline. Ergo, unless there are other claims to notoriety, its not a difficult vote. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 05:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Biological evolution (disambiguation)
Hi, Just FYI, I figure that Ed's closing comments are a valid part of the discussion. So I've moved them back inside the don't edit block. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Oh, Ed made it a bit confusing. He put a section break in front of the comment, so perhaps it wasn't intended to be part of the discussion. But even if that was the intent, I think it should be kept with the rest anyway. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:40, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Please Leave The Myspace Alone on Shane's Bio.
This MySpace Site has been Confirmed by the source. If you have any problems or Questions Please Contact Permission@wwe.com Thank You.

The preceding unsigned comment was left by User:Gottiman.

Fuck Off
Fuck off

Is very appropriate language as far as I'm concerned

''The preceding two comments were left by User:80.47.187.140 after I reverted a vandalism edit he made. The first was made under the Myspace comment. This comment is here just to fulfill my anal-retentive need to have everything in its place AND to have everything properly archived.''

Vandalism
No, I'm not here to post a nasty test 3 or 4 - I'm just here to say thanks for the reversion of the rather childish vandalism on my user page. I probably would have got to it myself, but I obviously wasn't in at the time, but nonetheless, thanks a bunch. --Master Jay 02:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia 05:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! My signature doesn't work because it gets displayed as all code.  :/  --King of All the Franks 06:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Congrats, fellow member of the ancient mystical order of admins.--Alhutch 08:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:support
Not a problem. Zordrac's lone opposition was one the weakest arguments I've ever read, though he supported mine. Confusing, I know. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  06:33, Dec. 17, 2005


 * No problem. I also think that Zordrac's one oppose was silly--he opposed me because being here for about 6 months made me a "total newbie." But you and I made it, so congratulations. :)

P.S. I'm not InShanee. :)--Shanel 06:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I've also stolen the design you used for your little thank you box thing. :P--Shanel 06:59, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

thanks for thanking me
--  A dam1213 Talk [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adam1213&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new +] 07:30, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

anger
you better shut your little butt ill unleash a computer virus that will destroy wikipedia forever.no i am just joking i am sorry i will not vandalise again

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Congratulations



 * Congrats! You'll be a great admin. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 15:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Somewhat belated congrats! HGB 15:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Belated as well, but same here. Congrats, bro! - Liontamer 23:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my page
Thanks for fixing the Florian Segginger page which is the article about myself =P

I can't believe some people are that immature. Oh well, that's the internet for ya

--TrashLock 21:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Block
Glad to amuse :"D, the anon also thought it was innappropriate given an another anon would encounter that brief and cryptic reason for their block. I'd like to think more users complaining with encounters like that would make AOL tweak their IP policy. But that's just my optimism talking. - RoyBoy 800 07:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Adventurer restored
Hi, MoO. I notice you made Adventurer into a redirect to Adventure. I restored it, since I don't think the terms are strictly identical: Please take a look at the article and my reasoning, and if you still disagree, let's work something out. GRuban 16:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Non-adventurers can go an an adventure
 * 2) a Victorian "adventuress" doesn't really have to do with "adventure", more with "gold-digging"
 * 3) especially in role-playing games, "adventurer" is a specific profession, separate from the adventure itself
 * 4) Finally, "Adventure" has 223 Disambiguation_pages_with_links and getting rid of a sizeable chunk that really want adventurer can only help.

Blunted affect
Please reconsider yr vote on the Afd page. Article expanded and cleaned up. -- Naif 17:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting AfDs
As I was told by an administrator, please comment out relisted debates, like so. Otherwise updating WP:AFD/Old gets messed up. I already did it for the ones you relisted from Dec 13. Thanks. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 19:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

malo's RfA
Mo0, thanks for your support on my RFA. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Bash.org AfD
No problem, I'm all about reducing the backlog on AfD. At least next time, you'll know what to do when that sort of thing crops up ;) But keep up the good work! Proto t c 09:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Arcipello
just checking if you read the final edit of the article 'Arcipello'. I admittedly know the artist in question but thought that he did deserve a wiki page. If you do a quick google search you will find that he is actually quite well known and thus valid as an artist and an article. I thought that my final edit cleaned up a lot of the vandalism and explained his importance somewhat.

Merry Christmas!!
cock

SORRY!
SORRY I JUST WANTED TO SEE IF I CAN REALLY EDIT WIKIPEDIA. COOL SITE. BUT KINDA DANGEROUS IF YOU CAN ALLOW ANYBODY WITHOUTH A MEMBERSHIP TO CHANGE DATA.

RG

RfA thanks from Deathphoenix
Hi Mo0 (nice name),

I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in my RfA. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist.

My wife sends her curses, as Wikipedia will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Wikipedia just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.

I'll make sure your trust in me, and in justice, is founded. --Deathphoenix 15:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

AfD Relisting
Heh, sorry about that - I did that with a few articles didn't I? I usually take care of these little details, but alas I missed a few. I notice I'm not the first to make that mistake, though! :-) Mind  matrix  00:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

George Reeves Project
When you tagged it with deletedpage, you forgot to actually protect it. I took care of and this is just an FYI. --GraemeL (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Oh, really? I wasn't aware of that, I thought I was supposed to leave it unprotected until it became a problem that way.  I'll remember that for next time, thanks! Mo0 [ talk ] 02:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I think it's safe to say this one was already a problem - log. --GraemeL (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Happy New Year
For last year's words belong to last year's language
 * And next year's words await another voice.
 * And to make an end is to make a beginning.
 * ''T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"


 * Happy New Year! &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)