User talk:Mobility99

Controversies
Discuss this on the talk page. Do not re-add this as there are multiple problems with it.  freshacconci  talk talk  14:14, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, how many accounts do you use? There are a number of account names containing 99 that have edited on the OCADU article. You are to use one account, otherwise you will be blocked for sockpuppetry.  freshacconci  talk talk  14:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

• So, you have no intention of responding to my comments or discussing the issue on the article talk page, and will keep reverting me, violating WP:3RR amongst a few other policies. Consider this a warning. Further violations of Wikipedia policies and guidelines may get you blocked, not to mention the probable sockpuppetry. And in the end, it's a huge waste if your time as that controversies section won't remain in the long run.  freshacconci  talk talk  14:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I've actually written on the article talk page.

You are quite rude and a bully.
 * What the hell is your problem? I have asked you many times to discuss this issue and you finally decide to discuss it, yet you once again add the section back into the article. You do understand that since the section is poorly written, and has many other problems, it won't stay there, right? And don't whine about bullying. I'm trying to engage with you and all you do is ignore my suggestions, refuse to discuss it, edit war and refuse to acknowledge actual Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Pointing this out to you is not bullying. And you still haven't responded to the sockpuppet issue. How many accounts do you use?  freshacconci  talk talk  14:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

lol, take a chill pill. I'm sorry I don't just sit at my computer all day like you do.
 * Actually, it looks like you do. But your comment shows just how little you regard the point of all this. In any case, another editor has now weighed in. Should I start the sockpuppety case or not? Are you going to stick to this one account or are you going to disappear and come back in a few months as Ocadu99?  freshacconci  talk talk  14:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * And now, after another editor has warned you, you re-add the same horribly written text? What part of collaboration and discussion do you fail to grasp?  freshacconci  talk talk  14:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

If you have a problem, then edit it and rewrite it.

Oh, and learn some manners.

May 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Read what I wrote and read what is in the article. There is no personal analysis.
 * I am trying to give you some friendly advice. You have already been blocked. You will be blocked again if you continue to edit in this manner. Be civil to other editors. Do not edit war. Discuss changes you want to make on the talk page. More than a few editors have warned you now. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia you have to work within the rules, just like the rest of us. This is not your personal website.  freshacconci  talk talk  22:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

One other editor, who looks like your friend.

2. You began the edit war instead of improving the article.

3. Learn what "a few" means

4. How many people have complained about you on your talk page?

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Freshacconci, you may be blocked from editing.  freshacconci  talk talk  14:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Colin Campbell (artist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at OCAD University, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  freshacconci  talk talk  22:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at OCAD University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  freshacconci  talk talk  22:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I have actually attempted to address ALL of the issues you have raised.

Instead of EDITING what you claim to be errors, you and your friend have just BLANKED my contribution.

This is wrong and two-faced.

It is also NOT the first time you have done this to other users

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 22:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Does that explain why you intentionally removed the top of WP:AIV four times? Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 23:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

If you want to get unblocked, why am I finding this and this? If you feel that other editors are being rude to you, lashing back at them isn't going to help your credibility any further. You asked for helpful advice. Well, here it is. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 03:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
 freshacconci  talk talk  00:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
 freshacconci  talk talk  00:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
 freshacconci  talk talk  00:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
 freshacconci  talk to me  11:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)