User talk:MobilityForAll

Welcome
Hello, MobilityForAll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mirokado (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Hands-free wheelchair
I have reverted your contribution to Wheelchair for the following reasons: It looks as if this may indeed be an interesting item to mention once it qualifies as notable and well-sourced. Once that is the case, you could add a paragraph to Wheelchair mentioning the main points of interest with one or two good inline references. Once this new chair starts being used by disabled dancers you could also expand Physically integrated dance or any article about the dance company using it. --Mirokado (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * it describes original research rather than an established product or technique reported by reliable third parties such as newspapers or academic journals
 * it was unreferenced (the video link does not count as a reliable reference)
 * the structure of that section is one brief paragraph per topic starting with a link to another wikipedia article, whereas the addition was seven further unstructured paragraphs. As well as not harmonising with the rest of the section this added undue weight to one product