User talk:Mobinah88

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad


Hello Mobinah88. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dr Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad


A tag has been placed on Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ifew.com/home/about/q-a-ahmad/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
(pasted from talk page) This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I was just using it as a reference. I wrote the original piece that was being referenced, so I referenced myself. I can reword it if required. I really don't want it deleted. This is the third time it is being deleted. I just wanted to write a wiki about my grandfather, who is a great leader in the community. --Mobinah88 (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Then you should reword it. Following WP:OTRS is a good idea too. There are several other problems: 1) as a decendant, you have issues with conflict of interest, 2) The tone of the article isn't written from a neutral point of view. It's strongly slanted toward glorifying him. See WP:PEACOCK for help. This isn't written like an encyclopedia article. It reads like a promotional piece and that's how it's going to be perceived if you don't make major changes. It wouldn't survival an deletion attempt. Sorry for being so critical but this is my honest opinion.  Royal broil  14:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mobinah88. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Qazi Ashfaq Ahmad, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)