User talk:Mobydick123

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Good on you mate & thanks for the support. obviously those 2 jokers dont understand irony.87.82.81.67 (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ward3001 (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * To Mobydick123 Thank you for your support, but it would appear that you may actually be doing me accidental and indirect harm by such action. Some people are convinced you are a "sockpuppet" (see above and respective talk pages). I would be very grateful if you would please confirm that you and I are not connected in any way. Please don't take this personally, but I gave my word that I would not create any further accounts or break any Wikipedia rules and I don't break my word. I am not sure who you should direct your confirmation to, but there are certain editors who seem to have it in for me, so please would you start with them. Thank you for your support & consideration. Captainclegg (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, happy to tell anyone that I am not connected to you. Sorry if i have caused you trouble. i never had an account before just edited, but decided to open one when i saw some of the blocking going on. hope this does it for you. keep on trucking!


 * AND NOW THEYVE BLOCKED ME. BOY THESE GUYS REALLY DONT LIKE ANYONE INTERFERING WITH THEIR PAGES. NEVER LET THE TRUTH GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD STORY. AND FOR John Cardnal (talk) YOU LET YOURSELF DOWN: MOBY DICK WAS BY HERMANN MELVILLE, BIGUSDICKUS WAS FROM MONTY PYTHON - DIFFERENT EVEN ON YOUR PLANET.


 * Thank you for that and I'm sorry if you have got problems now, but I'm grateful for your confirmation. Captainclegg (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

And, by the way, Captainclegg, it's just a matter of time before you're blocked using this sockpuppet. Ward3001 (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I am not a sock of anyone thank you. typical that if someone disagrees with you you start attacking

I gave my word yesterday that I would not create or use any 'sock' accounts. I have kept to my word and so do not appreciate being accused of breaking my word. I am not connected in any way with "Mobydick123, anon 87.194.126.222, and other socks". This is now dissolving into a personal & libellous attack. Please cease and desist. If you continue to inaccurately accuse me of lying I will report you for making personal, unfounded attacks. I am copying this to your individual talk pages as well and would appreciate an apology. I have however left a question on the consensus, but otherwise am staying out of this. Captainclegg (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring and not waiting for consensus
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ward3001 (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)