User talk:Mochi494

Welcome!
Hello, Mochi494, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Article issues
Your additions to the Cecilia Hyunjung Mo article include passages copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, your entire contribution was deleted. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Cecilia Hyunjung Mo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cecilia Hyunjung Mo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 03:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cecilia Hyunjung Mo
Hello, Mochi494,

Thank you for creating Cecilia Hyunjung Mo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"As the article stands, it's extremely unclear whether the subject meets WP:NPROF. There are no secondary sources about the subject, and there's no indication in the article itself that Mo has met the criteria laid out in WP:NACADEMIC. I noticed that the article was moved to draftspace earlier today by - It may be a good idea to incubate there for a bit longer."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 05:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * to clarify, there are two possible bases for notability

In either case, the routine facts of their life can be established by their own website or their institutional website, but those sites can not be used to show notability.  DGG ( talk ) 06:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:PROF which requires showing the person an authority in their field,  as shown by their academic publications (or major national level awards awards, or some similar factors that ar explained on that page)  If you're going to show a list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of the books; and   the 5 or so most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them;)
 * 2) WP:ANYBIO, which requires substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices . Publications by the individual themselves do not count here.