User talk:Mock wurzel soup

User talk:Mock wurzel soup/Archive 1 User talk:Mock wurzel soup/Archive 2

Ways to improve Società Nazionale Officine di Savigliano
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mock wurzel soup, thanks for creating Società Nazionale Officine di Savigliano!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Officine di Pietrarsa
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mock wurzel soup, thanks for creating Officine di Pietrarsa!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources and communication
Hello, can you please respond to the three messages above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you like, I could add the references from the Italian wikipedia articles. The reason I have not done so is that I have not actually seen them. Please advise. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Other Wikipedias aren't reliable sources, but if that's where you got your information from, copy them with their references and then make it clear on the talk page that this is a translation of the Italian Wikipedia article. Thanks for replying, Boleyn (talk) 18:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Cascade connection (capacitors) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cascade connection (capacitors). Since you had some involvement with the Cascade connection (capacitors) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SpinningSpark 11:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * No objection to deletion. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please check your bluelinks before posting
The problem link to DAB page Black Forest Railway in Frederick Robert Vere Douglas-Hamilton was fun to solve, but it took me 20 minutes to do so. Narky Blert (talk) 00:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Midi E 3101
Hi, do you know anything about this loco? File:Midi E 3101.jpg / 2C2 3100

When the Midi electrified in 1912, they ordered six similar 1′C1′ locos from different makers, in order to test the best electrical and mechanical systems. E 3101 was one of these. Later on, the Midi (and then SNCF) had a small class of 2′C2′ electrics with overlapping numbering. Was there anything in common between them? Was it even a rebuild?! Both of these classes (and E 3101 was German-built) were upset by the outbreak of war.

Supposedly the outcome of the trials was an order for some locos based on a combination of E 3201 and E 3401 features, with a 2′C2′layout. Was this the 2C2 3100 class? If so, when did the major differerences creep in - such as the change of electrification system from AC to DC – Pretty major! And why where they numbered from E 3101, overlapping another loco? Had it been scrapped by this time? Did the first AC trials take place pre- or post-war?

I've ordered a copy of the Ransome-Wallis book, but the two relevant pages are on Google too and don't seem to make it much clearer.

Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 11:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I have no information. It might be worth contacting Utilisateur:Flm Hirschberg . He says he is a specialist in the history of electric traction. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Dispute_resolution_noticeboard

MartinezMD (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Gustav Pielstick
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mock wurzel soup, thanks for creating Gustav Pielstick!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

MCAS
I agree with your that redirect of the MCAS article was premature. The effect of folding a portion of it into the B737MAX article is that the all of the context is lost -- the history and the comparison to the Airbus design philosophy. Now it is a couple of paras in a 90K article, a relative footnote. These are the same people that sent 2019 Boeing 737 MAX crisis to AfD. If I didn't know better, I would suspect them to be Boeing fanboys. Rhadow (talk) 11:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Pablo Miller for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pablo Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pablo Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MartinezMD (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rock Rail


Hello, Mock wurzel soup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rock Rail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Missing
Hello, I have added you to the missing Wikipedians, as we seek to remember and recognize significant editors who have left the project. Should you wish to return, you may remove the talk page template and your name from the list. Thank you for you work. --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mock wurzel soup/italy
User:Mock wurzel soup/italy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mock wurzel soup/italy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mock wurzel soup/italy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mock wurzel soup/sandbox
User:Mock wurzel soup/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mock wurzel soup/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mock wurzel soup/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mock wurzel soup/three-phase
User:Mock wurzel soup/three-phase, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mock wurzel soup/three-phase and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mock wurzel soup/three-phase during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fork99 (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)