User talk:Modesikuwasi

A page you started (The Consortium Agreement of 1954) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Consortium Agreement of 1954.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cockatoo Hotel


A tag has been placed on Cockatoo Hotel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://blogs.dailybreeze.com/history/2009/03/20/the-cockatoo-inn-former-south-bay-hot-spot-fell-on-cold-times/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 Iran floods
– Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your addition (COPYVIO)
I reverted your addition to Jimmy Carter's engagement with Khomeini. While I understand you tried to improve/expand the article, large parts of your additions violated WP:COPYVIO. You need to rephrase the information you want to add in your own words. If you have further questions, please let me know. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Likewise for Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. This is your second third and final warning about that. We can't have repeated copyrights violations continue. Making sure these sort of things don't proliferate is essential to the survival of the Wikipedia project. Thanks in advance. El_C 22:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Messages are left at user talk pages, not user pages. Anyway, you did more than paraphrase. You need to write your own prose. El_C 00:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyrights violations (you were warned 3 times). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 14:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This user was warned about inserting (and reinserting) copyvio multiple times, yet they continue to deny they engage in this. Example (from the first sentence):


 * shah’s rapid modernization programs quickly raised the standard of living in Iran and paved the way for their the social and economic mobility of their children. [includes the typo — bold is my emphasis]

Copyvio of shah.tv-o.link/. El_C 00:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I did a copyvio check with a random revision from his contributions and found this. Not sure of who copied from the other, but the most recent version has only a 30.6% chance . Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm not inclined to unblock based on that. From the beginning, too much of the content was also on shah.tv-o.link. The fact that even the typo remained throughout all this time is pretty convincing to me. We are not robots and those tools have their limits. El_C 09:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. The Earwig tool is very useful as a first clue, but indications of accuracy to 1 decimal place are to be entirely disregarded, and matches must be examined by humans. I've seen blatant copyright violations where the tool gave a very low match - it's based on algorithms which clearly sometimes don't work well with some texts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)