User talk:Modesto Montoya

Speedy deletion of Nucleon pair breaking
A tag has been placed on Nucleon pair breaking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Cold fission
Hi, This article was also nominated for deletion. I think it is savable as a stub class article, and edited it a bit to show the references more clearly and smooth the syntax, but it is on the edge of notability and minimum content requirements, so I would encourage you to strengthen it with additional material and explanation if you can. You might like to check my edit for physics correctness, as I may have mangled your meaning. I am a physicist, though with little expertise in nuclear physics. If you need help in the future with the English usage etc let me know. I have not looked at Nucleon pair breaking yet.

I am also putting a Wiki welcome template below with links that may help you around, as I see you are new to this game. Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 00:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Also, the "scission" wikilink points to an unrelated target article, so the term needs to be defined or a scission article needs to be written (& disambiguated). Wwheaton (talk) 00:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)