User talk:Modric 13

Modric's talk page

Proposed deletion of Lordhair


The article Lordhair has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence that this is a notable product, and little coverage. None of the English sources cited (9 of the 10) contributes to notability. Most are the company's own publicity."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 19:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lordhair for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lordhair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lordhair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Regarding your comparison with Mandom, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. A quick look at that article and available sources give me the initial impression that it may also warrant deletion. I'm going to review it further. Largoplazo (talk) 14:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mad Street Den
Hello Modric 13,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mad Street Den for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)