User talk:Moeron/Archive 7

Kind of back?
Kind of back is better than 'not back at all'. Your good friend "you know who" returned after realising his main IP was past it's 6 months block. I asked Admin Daniel for assistance. His case was re-opened and his IPs blocked for another 6 months. Look at the edit history of Iron Maiden... particularly at the edits of Mr Hooks21101 from early in November. He became a bit of a comic relief moment around here. Especially his comments on my static IP talk page. I have expressed concern to Daniel about 2 other editors. One who's been frequenting Phish related articles. And the other who has been editing the List of Iron Maiden band members article recently. I believe they may have a "hand inside them" working their edits. But time will tell. Nice to see you back. Have a nice day! 156.34.224.2 (talk) 00:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey there; thanks for the welcome back. I was busy with work, concerts, and weekend stuff since the time I left. With it getting colder now and darker earlier, I am in more often, so I will be around. Don't know how much. Keep me abreast of anything like this ... if nothing else, it is good for a laugh. Cheers! -- moe.RON  Let's talk  03:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Have a minute... picture question
Check out the image uploads from. Lots of logos... self-made full release claims. Is that legit? 156.34.215.188 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And... since I have your attention... Mr Fnlayson ( normally a quality editor ) is having a bit of a struggle with WP:FAIR over on the Lynyrd Skynyrd article. It's a standard "album covers aren't fair-use here" situation. I added very clear edit summaries to help him to understand but he hasn't read the policy thoroughly and does not understand it correctly. Some assistance next time your about. thanks! 156.34.215.188 (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I have been away for awhile, so I may be rusty here, but here is my thoughts on the logos: I personally do not see the purpose of logos for lesser-known subjects. Popular logos, such as the one for Google.com, should be used, but when it comes to bands and such, I find their inclusion nothing more than vanity. I find the inclusion of self-made logos even more disconcerting, since it is bordering line copyright infringement. Looking through WP:FU and WP:LOGOS (which is just a guideline) seems to come to the same conclusion. Also, if there is no firm, discernible, well-used logo for a band and this user has just made up logo images in order to make the article stand out (in lieu of a band photo), then I think the images are even less helpful to Wikipedia and would break policy (WP:FU). Anyway, that is all mostly my opinion. My suggestion would be to bring the topic up for discussion at WP:FU or WP:LOGOS or, if you don't think you will get a fair shake due to IP-bias, look for someone in those talk pages that seem knowledgeable enough and contact them directly (Perhaps even User:Betacommand, though he is often busy). Feel free to link this discussion/reply as well if you feel it would help. -- moe.RON  Let's talk  20:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello Moe
I've been on an extended vacation from Wikipedia. But I am finding more free time in the evenings and will try to get back onboard as often as I can. I see you haven't been around much yourself. Hope you had a good year and hope to see you around soon. Cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 02:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 14:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008
The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --17:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PhishCompanion2.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:PhishCompanion2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PinocCastleLevel.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:PinocCastleLevel.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Phishing Manual.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Phishing Manual.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PinocExtraLife.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:PinocExtraLife.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election
An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 13:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008
The April 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AP-TiS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AP-TiS.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --20:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008
The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008
The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 02:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Roswell episodes
Hi Moeron, I've proposed merging the individual Roswell episode articles into List of Roswell episodes. As a significant contributor to those articles your opinion is welcome at Talk:List of Roswell episodes. D0762 (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Digital Terrestrial Television in Ireland
You have stated that the article appears to contradict itself. In fact that does not appear to be so from my reading. The article relates to 2 periods. First the 2001 period where an attempted DTT never got off the ground. The 2nd is the 2 year trial which is in effect the beginning of the DTT rollout since RTE NL will also be involved in renting carriage to the commercial DTT company due to be shortly decided. Please indicate where exactly the contradiction to you appears to lie and you may modify the page accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scathain (talk • contribs) 21:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Phish and their music
I have nominated Phish and their music, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Phish and their music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members
 WikiProject Novels Roll Call WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María ( habla con migo ) 18:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Unconsctructive edits
? care to explain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TopHyatt (talk • contribs) 21:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Please, Clarify, Your, Talk, Page, Posts
Please would you kindly CLARIFY what you are getting at with your talk page posts. What you have written is generic and unhelpful. I have asked you for clarification once already which you have failed to provide. Please. Provide this.--TopHyatt (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:WEASEL; while we welcome your edits, you are not contributing anything to these articles more than further elaborating facts or statements. Also, some of the edits are including unsourced assertions, such as "the revered" and "in actual fact". -- moe.RON  Let's talk  21:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Rothschild family tree
Hi, I removed your speedy tag since I couldn't find an earlier AfD. Let me know if I missed something. Feel free to take it to AfD if you'd like, but I can't think of any reason to speedily delete it. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess I used the wrong tag. I will just Prod it again, which led to it being erased by the author and then speedied due to lack of content. Thanks! -- moe.RON  Let's talk  01:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

how was what I said 'vandalism' ?
all I did was put real information on the page.

What I said:

"Bernice is a surname or given name. The name is given to ONLY females and is pronouced 'ber-niece' or 'ben-ece'. Probably originated in bibical times. Frequently in ACTS in the New Testament as the sister of King Herod."

Now, how is that inappropriate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneakyandsexy (talk • contribs) 06:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

At aero 088
Hi! I think they might be two different books, but I'm not sure.Anyway in my book it's on page 226 (2008 edition) and it's not quite an entry, but just a picture on a page that explains telescoping bolts, with few explanations of the weapon itself, so that's why there's not much on the wiki page. Amendola90 (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Gotcha; cheers! -- moe.RON  Let's talk  20:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou.

Could you please explain the rules I have broken, and cite I wrote that was "Original Research." I am new to Wikipedia. Is there any other way I can contribute to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LethargicTurtle (talk • contribs) 18:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh!

Thanks, Moeron. I understand perfectly now why it was removed. I'll read the policy you mentioned here. In future, I'll remember to cite reliable sources. I appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LethargicTurtle (talk • contribs) 21:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Rahimi_Tabar
Hi, thank you for the message and yes, you are right, I didn't notice the revert by an admin, so I am sorry about that. I still believe the article is a candidate for speedy deletion though, so (as I am relatively new to this) could you please advise me on how I can propose the article again (or if you could do it yourself as an admin?). Thanks, Anthony 62.103.147.54 (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Usually, unless I feel very strongly about a page, I will step away for a couple of days before nominating for further deletion. However, if you feel the need to do so, your first option is to PROD the page, followed by sending it to Articles for Deletion discussion.
 * By putting YOUR REASON HERE on the page, someone will need to rectify your complaint of the page. If, after five days no one does OR doesn't removes the PROD template, the page will be deleted. At this stage, anyone can remove the PROD template if they feel the page meets requirements, even without an explanation.
 * Your next avenue after that would be nominating it for deletion through WP:AFD; that is a bit more in-depth so I suggest reading up about it at WP:AFD and/or DELETE. If you need to go to that level, feel free to come back for help.


 * I hope this helps; if you need further assistance, either add to your talkpage or ask me here. Cheers! -- moe.RON   Let's talk  23:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect
You recently made an incorrect comment to, specifically, this edit where you say "While it is true that non-admins may close WP:AFD discussion, this is not so for speedy requests."

Please see Deletion_policy: "Anyone except a page's creator may contest the speedy deletion of a page by removing the deletion notice from the page." The user is now blocked. If I were you, I would apologize on his talk page. Toddst1 (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I already found that, as I stated in the users talk page. -- moe.RON  Let's talk  00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)