User talk:Moetzes

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 17:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

He's back
This blocked user has returned as. Look at the two users' contributions. As he wrote above, moetzes is the Hebrew word meaning "council". 107.10.236.42 (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe try reporting to WP:SPI. ''' Datbubblegumdoe talk  contribs  15:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * See the first post at the top of this page. It was recommended to this user to chose new username. There is nothing disruptive in him registering new account.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was recommended that he "create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy" (emphasis added). He failed to do so. He is still editing (as ) on behalf of the Moetzes (i.e., Council) of Agudath Israel of America. But please, let's turn a blind eye to what he is doing. 63.116.31.198 (talk) 23:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

As I wrote above, this single-purpose account did not comply with the username policy. As, he is continuing to spam Wikipedia articles, primarily BLPs, with his organization's POV, often in violation of NOR (because the sources don't mention the subject of the biography). Please take action. Thank you. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 13:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for calling attention to this. I shall block the new account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Change of block conditions
The blocking administrator gave you the opportunity to "to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy". You chose instead to create a new account with a username which violated the same policy, in the same way, and used it to edit in ways which made it abundantly clear that you are here for the purpose of promoting a point of view on behalf of the organisation which this account represents. You have also been edit-warring, which is to say repeatedly editing articles to the version you prefer, in an attempt to impose your view of what the articles should say, in the face of clear consensus against you from other editors who have reverted your edits. Wikipedia works by collaboration and discussion, not by individual editors persistently repeating their preferred edits no matter what other editors think, presumably in the hope that eventually the other editors will give up, so that the most stubborn editor gets his or her way. For those reasons, the option of creating a new account which complies with policy has been withdrawn. However, if you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your organisation, and to avoid editing to promote, publicise, or advertise a point of view, you may still request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * You was advised (here) to post an unblock request and ask for a NEW username. You cannot request the "council2" name, as you was already using that username and it was blocked. You have to request a completely new username that would not suggest any connection to Moetzes/Council. You was also told that in the unblock request you have to "convince us that you understand the reason for your block". You did not even try to convince us. I'm afraid this unblock request is not going to pass, but since I'm involved, I'm leaving this to other admins to review.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Any administrator reviewing this unblock request may find it helpful to read Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ... now archived at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive906. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)