User talk:Mofochickamo

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Best wishes, Travb (talk) 03:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Peter Oppenheimer Reversion
I reverted your edit to the article on Peter Oppenheimer. The edit summary "Removed absolute crap information that was complete nonsense." was a bit offensive. I've looked and I cannot find a definitive source either way, but Robert Oppenheimer did have a son named Peter. Please Wikipedia:Assume good faith in the future with your edit summaries. —Cliffb (talk) 00:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Peter Oppenheimer Reversion Reversion
If you can't find a definitive source, then you shouldn't make assertions. My comment may have been offensive, but your contribution was inaccurate. This is an encyclopedia. Accuracy is of the upmost importance. Making a link based on completely unsubstantiated circumstantial evidence propagates misinformation, the exact opposite of what Wikipedia is trying to do. Your reversion of my edit was anything but good faith. It was petty tit-for-tat. Mofochickamo (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)