User talk:Mofs

Middlesbrough F.C. FAC proposal
Hi, you have proposed this article for WP:FAC but have not completed all the steps in the nomination. Please visit WP:FAC and complete the remaining steps of the nomination process. Thanks Keith D (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Middlesbrough F.C. Peer Review
No worries for the review. The main thing I can notice still to touch up is the introductory phrases e.g. "In 1905", "By 1974", "In April 1986", that will need a comma between them and the next part of the sentence. You'll need to do this if you want to push it to FAC. Peanut4 (talk) 19:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Middlesbroughprogramme.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Middlesbroughprogramme.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

The possessive apostrophe
Hi. Just a minor point on the use of the possessive apostrophe, following your edit to the Martin Whitmarsh article. Where a noun (including most proper nouns) is singular yet ends with a sibilant (usually -s) classical grammar still requires you to append a second s following the possessive apostrophe. The only occasion where it is incorrect to do so are those proper names that appear in the bible, and where the form of the noun makes the double sibilant difficult to say. As you would pronounce Ron's form "dennis-es" it clearly can take the second s. Take a look at this article for a fuller discussion. A very minor point, but as you were "correcting" another user's perfectly correct grammar I thought it worth mentioning.  Pyrop e  20:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Beware of false accusation
Hi Mofs, please be careful of false accusation such as your edit here where you reverted a removal of an invalid image with a clear edit summary as 'vandalism'. I was very dubious of the edits by 82.29.207.3 as being valid but wasn't sure if it was vandalism, so just removed the invalid image added. Regards 22:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, Mofs - Thanks for the message. I had assumed it was just a simple mistake, glad to hear it was, we all make them. Thought I's respond here as well so anyone seeing this page would know it was just a simple mistake and everything's good. All the Best. KylieTastic (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)