User talk:Mogwynn

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oklahoma Baptist University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=471912831 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Oklahoma Baptist University with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Note. Please consider bringing up this issue on the article talk page and discuss with other editors. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for updating me on the reversions of attempted updates to this page. As I understand it, content is to be objective. However, the text I had attempted to update was posted from a blog by a dissenting alumnus and is not factually accurate. Would it be better for me to attempt to use your space to add factual data and thereby make the "Controversy" section more of a place to air complaints than to convey a sense of encyclopedic data about the institution? I desire to abide by your standards and not waste time for either of us. Thanks!Mogwynn (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The best (and only) thing to do is to open a little section on the article talk page (Talk:Oklahoma_Baptist_University), and propose to remove the content, stating the reasons. It's just a matter of getting to an agreement with the other (possible) contributors. If nobody reacts to the proposal, you can probably safely remove the content after a few days, referring in your edit summary to the talk page. Cheers and good luck. - DVdm (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I notice that you and removed content without going to the talk page. The content seems to be backed by a book source and by the edu-home site itself. It . Please take the following 3rd level warning seriously:

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Oklahoma Baptist University, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)