User talk:Mohamed Shuhaib

Tiruppur
Hi - I reverted your changes at Tiruppur, for two reasons. First, you didn't provide a reliable source for the assertions you were adding - see our policy about verifiability. Also, it wasn't really clear what you were trying to say - our articles need to be written in clearly comprehensible English. Sorry Girth Summit  (blether)  16:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tiruppur. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 16:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again - the links in the message above are useful. Don't just keep trying to make the same change when other editors have reverted you. If you can find a source to support your assertions, you may reinstate them - I'll even help you draft the assertion if you like, but it must be properly supported by a reliable source. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  16:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)