User talk:Mohammad Ahmad Quadiri

Welcome!
Hi Mohammad Ahmad Quadiri! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

April 2020
Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wahhabism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and fix all the problems with it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I have tried to explain some of the problems below. Thank you. You replaced
 * The founder of the movement Ahmed Raza Khan said Wahhabis aren't Muslims, and any Muslim who has difficulty understanding this, has also left Islam.[369] [369]

With
 * Imam e Ahlus Sunnah Ash Shaah Ahmad Raza Khan Brailvi, during the era of sedition and rebellion, boldly undertook the journey of pilgrimage and prepared a document, in the form of questionnaire comprehending and bracketing the blasphemous utterances of Indian followers of Diabolos in 1323 AH and presented it to the Ulama of eminence of Makkah Mukarramah and Madinah Munawwarah under the name of Al-Mo’tamad Al-Mustanad making a supplication to them to guide the Muslims of sub-continent opinions and views of the illustrious Ulama of Makkah Mukarramah and Madinah Munawwarah were collected and A’Ia Hazrat Ash Shaah Ahmed Raza Khan Radi Allahu Anh in Arabic compiled a book. The historical name of this book is “Husaamul-Haramain Ala Manhar-if-Kufr-e-wal Mayn” (1324 AH). He has quoted references from the illustrious religious scholars and their books as under Bazaziah, Al-Durur Al-Ghurur, Fatawa Khairiah, Majma Al-Anhaar, Durr Al-Mukhtar, Qazi Ayaz illustrious book Al-Shifa Sharif, Bahr-ar-Raiq, Imam lbne Hajar in his work Al-Aalam, in which it has clearly been stated about these (wahabis) disbelievers that "whosoever has doubt in their blasphemy and chastisement, becomes disbeliever himself.",  And that "we call him a kafir (disbeliever), who creates eternal relation with a community other than Islam, or keeps their company or has doubt in their disbelief." And "whoever appreciates the discourse of people of greed and avarice or considers it a fact or believe in the accuracy thereof, if it is a blasphemy, the lauder of it shall be a disbeliever." And  “Whoever utters blasphemy, or whoever appreciates it or shows pleasure upon it, commits blasphemy”.


 * The eulogy written by one of the unique Verity of Ulama, sumptuousness of Divine erudites, man of dignity and praise, pride of men of excellence and glory, piety of ascetics, merit of glorious people, Shaikh of Preachers and Religious Leaders of Makkah, repeller of astrayness and disorder, bestower of bounties and righteousness, Maulana Abdul Khair Mir Dad (may Allah protect him till the day of judgment). “He (A'la Hazrat) has embellished his work Al-Motamat-ul-Mustanad with such arguments, proofs and expositions, which are acceptable to every man of faith, who looks at them with the sight of veneration and glory. Ahmad Reza Khan has shaken the foundations of unbelief and blasphemy. Whoever believes the sayings and doctrines based on unbelief is undoubtedly an unbeliever and misguided one. Such person beguiles others and is out of the pale of religion as an arrow is darted from the bow. According to all Ulama of Islam, who support Islamic community and path of Ahle-Sunnat-wa-Jamaat, all such sayings imply innovation and misguidance.”

Your text appears to have been copied-and-pasted from another website. That is probably a copyright violation. There is no citation. It is full of purple prose. It is not written from a neutral point of view (see Neutral point of view). Oh, and none of what you wrote is obviously relevant. Toddy1 (talk) 08:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)