User talk:Mohammad Jan Bugti

June 2020
Hello, Mohammad Jan Bugti. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  11:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Brahumdagh Bugti, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for letting me know. The sources aren't correct about the person in the page. It's okay, You may be misinformed. But I'm going to provide a source and make the correct changes. Thanks again. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Brahumdagh Bugti. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Brahumdagh Bugti. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Blablubbs (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brahumdagh Bugti. Blablubbs (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Those information are not misguided nor false that I added on the page. The references are by truth the corrected & CONFIRMED ones provided by reliable websites which you check out. I suggest you should also provide the change back the information I already added. Please do some research before you make false allegations. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Those information are not misguided nor false that I added on the page. The references are by truth the corrected & CONFIRMED ones provided by reliable websites which you check out. I suggest you should also provide the change back the information I already added. Please do some research before you make false allegations. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I've just realized that numerous edits were made prior to my own which removed large chunks of relevant, cited content on Brahmadagh Bugti. I'm going to proceed to undo some of these changes and return the article to its previous status. Please do some research Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I do not tend to violate the rules. I'm only reverting back the changes. I will provide you with the sources that my added information were correct then we can discuss on changing them back. If you say so? Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm undoing back the changes that were already not there or were somehow misinformed that is why this page, Brahumdagh Bugti, has been vandalized constantly by others and have added false information which I only tend to correct. So let's discuss. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 08:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The place for the discussion is at Talk:Brahumdagh Bugti. The three revert rule is brightline, you don't get a pass because you believe your edits are right because whoever is on the other side of the edit war also believes they are right. Note that stripping the article of reliably sourced content based on your own POV will likely not find consensus.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I believe my edits are right and I will provide reliable sources that will prove that they're correct. I'm a social media activist and I tend to write correct and relevant information on pages especially this one. Mohammad Jan Bugti (talk) 17:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)