User talk:Mohammed aman5803

July 2015
Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jeremie Lynch because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GiantSnowman 14:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeremie Lynch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jeremie Lynch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jeremie Lynch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 16:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Mohammed aman5803, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. GiantSnowman 08:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)